2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving the ‘good life’: Why some people want latrines in rural Benin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
180
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
16
180
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The gender variable is also not statistically significant. Results from Jenkins and Curtis (2005) and Santos et al (2011) indicate otherwise. Women are more likely to adopt better sanitation practices than men due to perceived benefits of greater dignity and safety.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gender variable is also not statistically significant. Results from Jenkins and Curtis (2005) and Santos et al (2011) indicate otherwise. Women are more likely to adopt better sanitation practices than men due to perceived benefits of greater dignity and safety.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimate a logit model, controlling for various household characteristics, namely gender, age, religion/caste, area, institution, and geography which are proxies for cultural differences in a vast country like India. Gender Jenkins and Curtis (2005) and Santos et al (2011) argue that since there is an element of safety and dignity associated with it, women are more likely to adopt a toilet in comparison with their male counterparts. Age Santos et al (2011) find younger respondents in Salvador and Brazil prefer to have toilets in comparison with their older cohorts.…”
Section: Controlling For Other Household Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-Hindu households are less likely to defecate in the open, but Table 3 shows that they also have more assets, are less educated, and are less likely to have infrastructure like electricity and piped water, on average. These factors are believed to be linked to latrine adoption (Duflo et al, 2015; Jenkins & Curtis, 2005; O’Connell, 2014; O’Reilly & Louis, 2014; Routray et al, 2015), and thus should be controlled for in some way.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the issue still needs to be tackled. The particular issue of latrines affects several key dimensions of the human being: the spread of infectious disease, the quality of the immediate environment, his/her dignity, and, therefore more widely, quality of life (Jenkins and Curtis, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors generally start from a collection of data obtained through household surveys, then they analyze the demand or the determinants of household choices in water access (see, for instance, Ahmad et al, 2005;Briand et al, 2009a;Briand et al, 2009b;Briand and Laré, 2013;Nauges and Strand, 2007;and Nauges and Whittington, 2009). Others analyze what motivates attitudes and preferences in terms of latrines and sanitation (Jenkins and Curtis, 2005;Whittington et al, 1993Whittington et al, , 2012 Another approach is the use of the hedonic pricing method (HPM) (Rosen, 1974). It has seen important development in the field of environmental and natural resources economics because of its ability to measure, from observed behaviors, values that households allocate to various amenities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%