2013
DOI: 10.13063/2327-9214.1031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving the Promise of Electronic Health Record-enabled Quality Measurement: a Measure Developer’s Perspective

Abstract: Electronic health record (EHR) systems support local quality improvement efforts by health care organizations and provide the opportunity to address national priority areas for quality measurement, such as specialty care, overuse and efficiency, coordination of care, change over time and patient- reported outcomes (PROs). However, variations in provider workflow and documentation habits, adoption of advanced EHR functions and exchange of interoperable data, and eMeasure specification standards affect the abili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although outcome data communicate accountability, they also need to inform decision making and improve population care (Daleiden & Chorpita, 2005; Torda & Tinoco, 2013). As EMR technology, quality measures, and quality indicators become standardized under the ACA, monitoring of outcomes on the healthcare system level can identify potential population needs (e.g., gaps in quality of care, patient-centeredness) to inform future interventions.…”
Section: Quality Indicators: From “I'm Feeling Better” To Outcome Mea...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although outcome data communicate accountability, they also need to inform decision making and improve population care (Daleiden & Chorpita, 2005; Torda & Tinoco, 2013). As EMR technology, quality measures, and quality indicators become standardized under the ACA, monitoring of outcomes on the healthcare system level can identify potential population needs (e.g., gaps in quality of care, patient-centeredness) to inform future interventions.…”
Section: Quality Indicators: From “I'm Feeling Better” To Outcome Mea...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As EMR technology, quality measures, and quality indicators become standardized under the ACA, monitoring of outcomes on the healthcare system level can identify potential population needs (e.g., gaps in quality of care, patient-centeredness) to inform future interventions. For example, EMR-based quality measures can be used to identify trends and patterns in clinical data that may vary by, for example, ACO (Torda & Tinoco, 2013). Similar to quality improvement on the organizational level (Hermann, Chan, Zazzali, & Lerner, 2006), quality improvement on the system level will enable intended audiences such as policymakers to use quality indicators for decision making (Zima et al, 2013).…”
Section: Quality Indicators: From “I'm Feeling Better” To Outcome Mea...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, challenges arise from the use of different EHR systems across hospitals and the heterogeneity of data, resulting in limited interoperability. Limited interoperability and inconsistent data exchange across settings are significant barriers to quality improvement [102]. The interoperability of EHRs with medical data is becoming increasingly valuable because of its potential to increase the availability of data exponentially or directly impact the activation of research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interoperability of EHRs with medical data is becoming increasingly valuable because of its potential to increase the availability of data exponentially or directly impact the activation of research. EHR systems can efficiently support data structuring and quality measurement results and exert great impact on patients and their time [102]. Interoperability among EHR systems refers to the linking of data, which improves data usability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality calculations for reporting in this program used information available in EHRs; challenges have been noted in this approach. 10 11 12 Unlike HEDIS, EHRs often calculate measure compliance using only data documented within that EHR, in part due to lack of health information exchange and interoperability challenges. 13 14…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%