“…For the abovementioned color modulation of Ln-UCNPs via the way of tuning the flux density of excitation laser, the dauntingly high power is needed in some cases for achieving desired contrast, which generally impedes its application. As an alternative to the abovementioned strategy, time-gating strategy for color modulation is based on the discrepancy in the temporal characteristic of the key cross-relaxation processes, which typically enables filtrating those luminescence features based on the relatively slow cross-relaxation upconversion process by reducing the pulse duration time of the excitation laser. ,, For the energy transfer upconversion processes crucial to the color modulation of Ln-UCNPs developed herein, namely Yb 3+ ( 5 F 5/2 ) → Er 3+ ( 4 I 11/2 ), Yb 3+ ( 5 F 5/2 ) → Tm 3+ ( 3 H 5 ), Er 3+ ( 4 I 11/2 ) → Tm 3+ ( 3 H 5 ), and Tm 3+ ( 3 H 5 ) → Er 3+ ( 4 I 13/2 ), respectively, the first one was characterized with appreciably high rate as compared to the last three due to the energy match in the former and energy mismatch in the latter cases. ,, This means that the trapping-based red luminescence emission with the involvement of the last three processes unequivocally lagged behind the green emission based on the first process, which was expected to enable temporally filtrating the red luminescence by appropriately decreasing the pulse width of the excitation laser. Taking this, we evaluated the upconversion luminescence features of the as-prepared luminescent NaGdF 4 :20%Yb, 10%Er, 0.5%Tm nanoparticles using pulsed laser as the excitation source.…”