2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving zero extinction for land plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, when proven relevant and accurate enough, rates of recent change values might eventually also be included in the decision tree that leads up to the final species extinction risk status. The combination of high rates of recent change within tree species’ extent, the likely amplification from spatial overlap in threats, and the mismatch with current species’ IUCN Red List statuses implies that (1) tree species labeled as Not Threatened are not sensitive to the studied threats (yet genetic diversity may be decreasing) 76 or (2) these species require a IUCN Red List re-evaluation. On the other hand, the 17,393 species that were identified for prioritization include only 63.9% of all Threatened species and 60.8% of all Vulnerable species, suggesting that (3) threatened species with lower rates of recent change values may be more sensitive to specific threats or (4) threats can be harmful even with low rates of recent change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, when proven relevant and accurate enough, rates of recent change values might eventually also be included in the decision tree that leads up to the final species extinction risk status. The combination of high rates of recent change within tree species’ extent, the likely amplification from spatial overlap in threats, and the mismatch with current species’ IUCN Red List statuses implies that (1) tree species labeled as Not Threatened are not sensitive to the studied threats (yet genetic diversity may be decreasing) 76 or (2) these species require a IUCN Red List re-evaluation. On the other hand, the 17,393 species that were identified for prioritization include only 63.9% of all Threatened species and 60.8% of all Vulnerable species, suggesting that (3) threatened species with lower rates of recent change values may be more sensitive to specific threats or (4) threats can be harmful even with low rates of recent change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizen science plays an important role in plant conservation. Volunteers record the plants they see and publish them on the website, including photos, discovery dates and coordinates, which can help people discover and protect species, thereby helping to achieve the ambitious goal of zero plant extinction [62]. It is mentioned in Goal A for 2050 of GBF, that is "human-induced extinction of known threatened species is halted".…”
Section: Ecosystem and National Key Protected Wildlife Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizen science plays an important role in plant conservation. Volunteers record the plants they see and publish them on the website, including photos, discovery dates and coordinates, which can help people discover and protect species, thereby helping to achieve the ambitious goal of zero plant extinction [66]. It is mentioned in Goal A for 2050 of GBF, that is "human-induced extinction of known threatened species is halted".…”
Section: Increased Public Awareness Of Biodiversity Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%