2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acid aspiration prophylaxis in labour: a survey of UK obstetric units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The H 2 receptor blockers were most commonly used in our study often complemented with sodium citrate before induction. A study in 2005 looked at antacid prophylaxis in UK obstetric units 27 and reported a decrease in the routine use of acid aspiration prophylaxis in 32% of units but an increase in recommendation to use in the 'at risk' groups. We reported a large number of omissions in antacid prophylaxis in what were mainly emergency GAs and a larger proportion of our index cases receiving antacids than our controls.…”
Section: Prophylaxis Against Acid Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The H 2 receptor blockers were most commonly used in our study often complemented with sodium citrate before induction. A study in 2005 looked at antacid prophylaxis in UK obstetric units 27 and reported a decrease in the routine use of acid aspiration prophylaxis in 32% of units but an increase in recommendation to use in the 'at risk' groups. We reported a large number of omissions in antacid prophylaxis in what were mainly emergency GAs and a larger proportion of our index cases receiving antacids than our controls.…”
Section: Prophylaxis Against Acid Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding of this study indicated that more than half of anesthetic providers (54%) administered aspiration prophylaxis routinely. While a survey study of UK obstetric unit on acid aspiration prophylaxis in labor found that an increase in the use of acid aspiration prophylaxis for at risk parturients to 61% [ 36 ]. This discrepancy might be due to clinical setup differences as the UK is the most developed country and they might have clinical evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-risk women are allowed a light diet. High-risk women should not eat but may have clear oral fluids, preferably isotonic drinks, together with oral administration of H 2 -receptor antagonists every 6 h [40,41]. If anaesthesia is required for delivery, an H 2 -receptor antagonist should be given intravenously if not already administered, with the aim of reducing the risk of aspiration at extubation.…”
Section: Classification Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%