procedure she complained of the sudden onset of pain in the chest, shortness of breath, and haemoptysis. A lung scan showed lage areas of impaired perfusion in both lung fields typical of pulmonary embolism. There were no physical signs in her legs but testing with the ultrasound flow detector showed an impairment of venous flow in the left popliteal and lower femoral vein. Peripheral ascending phlebography was carried out as an emergency procedure and showed extensive recent, non-adherent thrombus in most of the calf veins, the popliteral vein, and lower femoral vein of the left side (see Fig.).It was considered advisable to protect her against a further and
CommentThis case shows that thrombus can propagate along a vein very quickly. Within an hour the risk to this patient of developing a massive, as opposed to a minor, pulmonary embolus was seriously increased, because the potential embolus had doubled in size. Anticoagulants had not been given because of the recent episode of haemorrhage from the cerebral artery aneurysm and it may be that they would have prevented the growth of the thrombus. Normally we find at operation that the thrombus fits the phlebogram perfectly, but most of these patients are already anticoagulated with heparin as the first line of treatment of their pulmonary embolus.If thrombus can grow so quickly then the value of any routine screening procedure, such as ultrasound flow detection or the labelled fibrinogen uptake test, in the prophylaxis of sudden massive embolism is open to doubt.This case emphasises the urgency with which any procedure must be carried out when attempting to prevent recurrent pulmonary embolism.