2015
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta03992k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acid-functionalized UiO-66(Zr) MOFs and their evolution after intra-framework cross-linking: structural features and sorption properties

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
150
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
15
150
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Except for the UiO‐66_Cl 2 AzoBDC solid, these values are almost equal to those calculated from the Gualtieri model, being both E a n and E a g. Finally, if one compares these values with those reported for other MOFs,10, 11 the values for UiO‐66 and UiO‐66_NDC are, to date, the lowest reported so far, close to those typically reported for inorganic solids 16. However, the values for UiO‐66_BPDC and UiO‐66_Cl 2 AzoBDC are in the same order of magnitude to the E a reported for other MOFs,10f,j such as, for instance, E a n of 71(3) and E a g of 66(6) kJ mol −1 for Zr‐fumarate 10a…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Except for the UiO‐66_Cl 2 AzoBDC solid, these values are almost equal to those calculated from the Gualtieri model, being both E a n and E a g. Finally, if one compares these values with those reported for other MOFs,10, 11 the values for UiO‐66 and UiO‐66_NDC are, to date, the lowest reported so far, close to those typically reported for inorganic solids 16. However, the values for UiO‐66_BPDC and UiO‐66_Cl 2 AzoBDC are in the same order of magnitude to the E a reported for other MOFs,10f,j such as, for instance, E a n of 71(3) and E a g of 66(6) kJ mol −1 for Zr‐fumarate 10a…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Finally, it was recently highlighted that, providing that the ligand is soluble enough, several UiO‐66‐type solids could also be prepared in water 10a. 11 The influence of the solvent (water vs. DMF) on the crystallization rate was also assessed for UiO‐66‐NO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This refinement gave a unit cell volume of 1411 Å 3 , which is slightly smaller than its corresponding dehydrated phase (1431 Å 3 ) despite the fact that no strong interactions are expected between the additional -Cl groups and the MeOH guest molecules that might result in a contraction of the framework. 31 In contrast to the other frameworks, the -(OH) 2 modified framework contracts during thermal treatment and this contraction is complete by 110 °C. Furthermore, all of the frameworks showed some hysteresis upon cooling to room temperature; the frameworks remained in their respective dehydrated phases to temperatures lower than those required to dehydrate them.…”
Section: Structural Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques such as X-ray diffraction must be able to penetrate the reaction vessel. The existing literature on in situ diffraction studies of MOF formation remain sparse, and generally utilize energy dispersive XRD (EDXRD); [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] more recently, advances in technology have made monochromatic XRD experiments feasible, although so far only work on mechanochemical MOF synthesis has been published. [8] Monochromatic in situ XRD experiments have mostly been limited to small-volume reaction using heated capillary microreactors; a range of systems have been studied, including ternary sulfides, metal oxides and bismuth chalcogenides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%