1961
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1902(61)80394-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acidic esters of phosphonic acid as selective extractants for metallic cations-selected M(III) tracer studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). As expected, [37] the K ex values in the HEH[EHP]/H 2 BP18C6 system are lower than those of HDEHP/H 2 BP18C6 system by 1-2 orders of magnitude, reflecting the lower extracting power of the less acidic phosphonic acid extractant HEH [EHP]. For example, the K ex value for Am-HEH[EHP] is 50 times smaller than the corresponding K ex value for Am-HDEHP.…”
Section: Separation Using Hdehp or Heh[ehp]mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…4). As expected, [37] the K ex values in the HEH[EHP]/H 2 BP18C6 system are lower than those of HDEHP/H 2 BP18C6 system by 1-2 orders of magnitude, reflecting the lower extracting power of the less acidic phosphonic acid extractant HEH [EHP]. For example, the K ex value for Am-HEH[EHP] is 50 times smaller than the corresponding K ex value for Am-HDEHP.…”
Section: Separation Using Hdehp or Heh[ehp]mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This is indeed the case for the LN2 resin, an EXC material based on (2ethyl-1-hexyl) phosphonic acid (HEH [EHP]). This compound is not new 45 but as yet it has been little used in geochemistry 46,29 compared to the classical HDEHP. Both ligands belong to the same class of acidic organophosphorus extractants, which have an increasing affinity for lanthanide complexation from the light to the heavy elements, allowing individual lanthanides to be separated from adjacent species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures (6)(7)(8) (m) number of stages in the scrub section Including the feed case of Pm, and t number of cycles which for the purpose of this comparison will be the same for both components. Prom Table 13, an average value of n is seen to be approximately 1.7 and m =: 2.75.…”
Section: Optimum Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%