1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf00589134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acidification of phosphate buffer in cortical tubules of rat kidney

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…sec-), and r is the luminal radius expressed in cm (Gertz, 1963;Malnic & Mello Aires, 1971;Malnic et al 1972b). Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…sec-), and r is the luminal radius expressed in cm (Gertz, 1963;Malnic & Mello Aires, 1971;Malnic et al 1972b). Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study deals with a quantitative analysis of intratubular titratable acid formation and compares the latter with bicarbonate reabsorption. Stationary microperfusion methods were combined with continuous measurements of pH changes of luminally deposited buffers (Malnic & Mello Aires, 1971; Malnic, Mello Aires, de Mello & Giebisch, 1972b). This approach offers some advantages over free-flow measurements of acid-base parameters in buffer-loaded animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were prepared for micropuncture as previously described (Malnic, de Mello Aires & Giebisch, 1972). They received a standard rat-pellet diet and were allowed free access to food and water until the time of the experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the course of such studies it was also observed that the net flux of H + into luminal phosphate corresponded to about half of that of the reabsorption rate of an equal tubular load of bicarbonate and that both acidification rates were significantly inhibited by acetazolamide (Malnic & de Mello Aires, 1971;Malnic, de Mello Aires, de Mello & Giebisch, 1972;Giebisch et al, 1977). These differences in the acidification kinetics of the two buffer species could be due either to the presence of an additional transport mechanism for ionic bicarbonate, or both processes could be mediated by hydrogen ion secretion, different rates of acidification resulting from specific properties of the two buffer systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microperfusion studies in which the acidification of luminal bicarbonate and phosphate buffers was studied have characterized some of the mechanisms by which proximal and distal tubules reabsorb bicarbonate and secrete H ions (Gottschalk, Lassiter & Mylle, 1960;Malnic & Mello Aires, 1971;Malnic, Mello Aires, de Mello & Giebisch, 1972;Vieira & Malnic, 1968; Giebisch, Malnic, de Mello & de Mello-Aires, 1977). In such studies it became apparent that not only hydrogen ion secretion but also buffer anion movement per se could affect the observed pH changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%