Background and Objectives
Frequent platelet transfusion may lead to the formation of alloantibodies and immune鈥恗ediated platelet destruction. Currently, identifying economic and effective screening methods is necessary for the management of platelet transfusion while different tests were recommended. The present study aims to challenge the performance of slot blotting (SB) and flow cytometry (FC) assays in detecting immune platelet refractoriness.
Materials and Methods
Sera from 118 patients who received blood components and were clinically suspected of platelet refractoriness were enrolled. Platelet鈥恟eactive antibodies were explored in parallel by SB, FC and monoclonal antibody鈥恠pecific immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) techniques. In a further study, chloroquine鈥恡reated platelets were incubated with MAIPA鈥恜ositive serum, and then, the results of the SB and FC techniques were compared.
Results
Using MAIPA as a reference, antibodies were detected in 51 sera, with specificity for human leucocyte antigens (HLA), human platelet antigens (HPA) or both HLA/HPA, in 27, 18 and 6 patients, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of SB and FC were 86路3%, 88路1%, 82路4% and 95路5%, respectively. The Spearman correlation revealed significant (P聽<聽0路001) correlations between FC (r聽=聽0路763) and SB (r聽=聽0路738) with MAIPA. In respect to HPA antibody detection, SB had 83路3% sensitivity and 92路6% specificity compared to 91路7% and 96路3% for FC while both approaches are acceptable (P聽<聽0路001, r聽=聽0路69; P聽<聽0路001, r聽=聽0路773) and can be recommended.
Conclusions
The present study acknowledges that among the used methods, the flow cytometry's performance is the most appropriate, but slot blotting, with acceptable sensitivity, can be used as an acceptable and convenient procedure for platelet antibody screening.