2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACIX-Aqua: A global assessment of atmospheric correction methods for Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 over lakes, rivers, and coastal waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
146
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
10
146
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to analyze algorithm performance over a range of OWTs, the typology developed in [50] and modified in [51] was used. Spyrakos et al [50] collected a comprehensive dataset from more than 250 aquatic ecosystems, including inland waters and coastal areas, representing a wide range of optical conditions.…”
Section: Owtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to analyze algorithm performance over a range of OWTs, the typology developed in [50] and modified in [51] was used. Spyrakos et al [50] collected a comprehensive dataset from more than 250 aquatic ecosystems, including inland waters and coastal areas, representing a wide range of optical conditions.…”
Section: Owtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following sections, we provide: 1) a description of the bio-optical and limnological data collected at the study sites; 2) the development and evaluation of the performance of several ML algorithms to estimate PC from hyperspectral data resampled to HICO spectral bands; 3) an application of the topperforming ML algorithm to simulated PRISMA, OLCI, MSI, OLI, and LNext reflectance data to quantify the performance loss due to the reduced spectral capability; and 4) a comparison of the performance of selected state-of-the-art PC algorithms against the top-performing ML algorithm. The performance assessments among different band configurations and algorithms are discussed based on a subset of optical water types (OWTs), following [50] and [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MERIS L2 FRS imagery were downloaded from ESA's MERIS Catalogue and Inventory (MERCI) [49] and Sentinel 3A OLCI L2 Marine products were downloaded from EUMETSAT's Copernicus Online Data Access (CODA) data portal. Accurate atmospheric correction over turbid inland waters remains a challenge and requires better representation of aerosols, improvements in corrections for sky glint, and adjacency effects [50]. Here the standard L2 reflectance products were used, but the model could equally be trained on any one of a number of state-of-the-art atmospherically corrected products such as those assessed in Pahlevan et al [50].…”
Section: Satellite Imagery and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate atmospheric correction over turbid inland waters remains a challenge and requires better representation of aerosols, improvements in corrections for sky glint, and adjacency effects [50]. Here the standard L2 reflectance products were used, but the model could equally be trained on any one of a number of state-of-the-art atmospherically corrected products such as those assessed in Pahlevan et al [50].…”
Section: Satellite Imagery and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainties of the remote sensing reflectance, R rs , are estimated by comparison of the water parameters determined from the satellite imagery with the "true" values, which can be determined, for an example, in very uniform clear waters in which all water parameters can be connected to the concentration of chlorophyll-a, [Chl]. 16 A second approach is to compare data from satellite with field measurements from the towers in the ocean, the Aerosol Robotic Network for Ocean Color (AERONET-OC 17,18 ) sites or from ships. 19 Such comparisons can be carried out in a wide range of waters; however, they are associated with multiple additional uncertainties, which are related to the quality of field measurements themselves, 20 water variability inside pixels, and time difference between in situ and satellite data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%