2021
DOI: 10.1002/jmcd.12209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acknowledging Intersectional Identity in Supervision: The Multicultural Integrated Supervision Model

Abstract: Supervision is considered a critical component in the development of mental health professionals. Thus, to ensure ethical services are provided to clients, supervisors should integrate multicultural perspectives within supervision. Multicultural and social justice principles, although present in the literature, have not been successfully incorporated into previous process and developmental models as viable enhancers to practitioner growth. The multicultural integrated supervision model presented in this articl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also essential to address the mental health and ecological needs of persons and communities impacted by such forms of oppression (Bruner et al, 2019; Ramírez Stege et al, 2020). Arguably, supervision incorporating multicultural and social justice approaches can provide educators and supervisors with a dynamic framework to address and build competence in working with diverse cultures, marginalization, colonization, oppression, privilege, and ecologies (Arczynski & Morrow, 2017; Dollarhide et al, 2021; Mitchell & Butler, 2021). In addition, this type of approach has assisted the shift from a deficit-focused framework for conceptualizing those within the margins to a more holistic and resilience-based approach (Hernández & McDowell, 2010; Peters, 2017; Singh & Chun, 2010; Tarshis & Baird, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also essential to address the mental health and ecological needs of persons and communities impacted by such forms of oppression (Bruner et al, 2019; Ramírez Stege et al, 2020). Arguably, supervision incorporating multicultural and social justice approaches can provide educators and supervisors with a dynamic framework to address and build competence in working with diverse cultures, marginalization, colonization, oppression, privilege, and ecologies (Arczynski & Morrow, 2017; Dollarhide et al, 2021; Mitchell & Butler, 2021). In addition, this type of approach has assisted the shift from a deficit-focused framework for conceptualizing those within the margins to a more holistic and resilience-based approach (Hernández & McDowell, 2010; Peters, 2017; Singh & Chun, 2010; Tarshis & Baird, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highlighting and centring culture and justice issues in supervision has led to the application of postmodern and critical literature, frameworks, and practices. One emerging framework used to discuss the multiplicity of identity, social justice, power, and marginalized and privileged social structures is evident in the theory of intersectionality (Chan et al, 2018; Crenshaw, 1989), which is beginning to be synthesized into the supervision literature (Hernández & McDowell, 2010; Mitchell & Butler, 2021; Peters, 2017; Tarshis & Baird, 2021). Likewise, scholars have begun to develop postcolonial and decolonial approaches to supervision which aim to disrupt the hegemonic, Eurocentric, individualistic, and majoritarian values and discourses that influence the origin, theories, and process of clinical supervision (Hernández & McDowell, 2010; Ramírez Stege et al, 2020; Singh & Chun, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evolution may extend the fourth and fifth forces of counseling (Peters & Luke, 2021a; Ratts et al., 2016) or serve as a sign post marker of the sixth force of counseling. More generally, the development of these 10 principles of anti‐oppression also aligns with recent scholarship integrating and demanding the inclusion of critical and intersectionality within counseling and counselor education to address the multiplistic forms of systemic and structural discrimination and oppression for marginalized persons and communities across counseling (Ali & Lee, 2019), leadership and advocacy (Peters, Chan, et al., 2022; Peters et al., 2020; Peters & Luke, 2021b), research (Chan et al., 2019; Hays & Singh, 2023; Sharma et al., 2021), supervision (Mitchell & Butler, 2021; Peters, 2017; Peters, Bruner, et al., 2022), and teaching (Chan et al., 2018; Shannon, 2020). The results of the current study further the scholarship by extending and centering the focus on anti‐oppression, which parallels and differs from the extant counseling literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework of intersectionality has become a mainstay of counseling research and practice, given its theoretical underpinnings in social justice (see Chan & Erby, 2018;Mitchell & Butler, 2021). As the framework becomes more visibly mainstreamed into the counseling profession, intersectionality promulgates a social justice ethos (Collins & Bilge, 2020) that links cohesively with its intentions of an active social justice agenda and underscores grassroots efforts for activism and advocacy (Collins, 2019).…”
Section: Christian D Chan Adrienne N Erby and Matthew C Fullen Guest Editorsmentioning
confidence: 99%