Trapping Safety Into Rules 2017
DOI: 10.1201/9781315549774-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acknowledging the Role of Abductive Thinking: A Way Out of Proceduralization for Safety Management and Oversight?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These include acting based on extensive and detailed procedural systems. This is comparable to the role of resilience described in other research on high reliability management and HROs [12,14,[21][22][23]. During the interviews, airline management representatives underscored the importance of a successful merger between best practice with planning and procedures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include acting based on extensive and detailed procedural systems. This is comparable to the role of resilience described in other research on high reliability management and HROs [12,14,[21][22][23]. During the interviews, airline management representatives underscored the importance of a successful merger between best practice with planning and procedures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The frequency of these events raised concerns that there may be precursor conditions causing the trends. During interviews, we were informed of how the safety manager and the FDMG had engaged in a process of abductive analysis [22], creating a hypothesis of what could be causing the trends. At three airport's, incident trends were associated with pilots repeatedly adapting their landing approaches to a combination of technological changes and constraints in the airports infrastructure and support systems.…”
Section: Precursor Resilience In Practice: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, reliability professionals see their systems in more concrete, real-time perspectives than those design engineers who conceive of systems abstractly through formal analytic models. They are extremely good at pattern recognition and at the formulation and remembering of action scenarios in relation to new operational problems they may confront (Roe and Schulman, 2008;Pettersen, 2013). In this way, they contribute to detecting ''weak signals" concerning changes in conditions of operations that degrade reliability.…”
Section: A Model Of Drift Management In High Reliability Settingsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…By developing strategies to include in analysis multiple perspectives and experiences that address their systems' range of potential states, and by the careful monitoring of both their internal operations and their environment, high reliability organizations are able to better identify early warnings and take into account uncertainties as part of daily operations (Roe and Schulman, 2008;Pettersen, 2013). Elaborate inter-organizational meetings, as well as communication networks for knowledge sharing are developed in these organizations to provide feedback, critiques and the integration of information across levels, both vertically and horizontally (Weick and Roberts, 1993;Pettersen and Aase, 2008).…”
Section: A Distorted Perspective On Hros?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation