2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-68143-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACL Semantics Between Social Commitments and Mental Attitudes

Abstract: Abstract. There are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent communication languages, based either on mental attitudes or on social commitments. In this paper, we translate both traditions in a different approach in which the dialogue state is represented by the beliefs and goals publicly attributed to the roles played by the dialogue participants. On the one hand, this approach avoids the problems of mentalistic semantics, such as the unverifiability of private mental states. On the other hand, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [1] roles are used to model interaction, so agents exchange messages according to some protocol passing via their roles. This means that the agent have to act on the roles, e.g., to specify which is the move the role has to play in certain moment.…”
Section: Agents and Rolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In [1] roles are used to model interaction, so agents exchange messages according to some protocol passing via their roles. This means that the agent have to act on the roles, e.g., to specify which is the move the role has to play in certain moment.…”
Section: Agents and Rolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1] the model is specifically used to provide a semantics for agent communication languages in terms of public mental attitudes attributed to roles. The basic ideas of the model are:…”
Section: The Public Dimension Of Rolesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations