2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0025100305001921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish

Abstract: Phonologists have long discussed the properties of 'stress' in Turkish, though there are some authors that suggest that Turkish is actually a pitch-accent language. As a first step in determining whether Turkish should be grouped with pitch-accent languages such as Basque and Japanese or with stress-accent languages such as English, this experimental study provides a detailed phonetic examination of word-level accent in Turkish. Seven female native speakers of Turkish were recorded saying 40 target words in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kamalı (2011) provides a unified account of different pitch accents and edge tones suggested by Kan (2009) and builds a phonological model of Turkish intonation. This model is built upon two main assumptions: (i) following Levi (2005), the author considers Turkish as a lexical pitch-accent language, and (ii) finally stressed words are suggested to be not lexically stressed. In this model, the words with a nonfinal stress are claimed to have a lexical pitch accent, H*+L, as in Tokyo Japanese (Beckman & Pierrehumbert 1986, Pierrehumbert & Beckman 1988) and the words with a final stress are claimed to have no lexical specification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kamalı (2011) provides a unified account of different pitch accents and edge tones suggested by Kan (2009) and builds a phonological model of Turkish intonation. This model is built upon two main assumptions: (i) following Levi (2005), the author considers Turkish as a lexical pitch-accent language, and (ii) finally stressed words are suggested to be not lexically stressed. In this model, the words with a nonfinal stress are claimed to have a lexical pitch accent, H*+L, as in Tokyo Japanese (Beckman & Pierrehumbert 1986, Pierrehumbert & Beckman 1988) and the words with a final stress are claimed to have no lexical specification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is YS simply a stress system with pitch as the phonetic correlate of stress (like Turkish, Levi 2005)? An impediment to this view, in favor of the pitch accent analysis, is that word accent interacts with intonation.…”
Section: Interaction Of Lexical Prosody With Intonationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The default stress position is word-final, as shown it (9). It has been argued for Turkish (Levi 2005) that its default final stress is postlexical: it is predictable, not "strong," and native speakers are not aware of it. This seems to be the case for the related CT as well, even though more work is needed on the precise description of CT stress.…”
Section: Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%