2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic detection of invisible damage in aircraft composite panels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low energy impacts can cause a complex net of matrix cracking and delaminations inside a composite, which can decrease its strength and durability. The danger of such damage is that in most cases they are invisible on the surface and cannot be detected during visual inspections of the structure, hence they are often called Barely Visible Impact Damage (BVID) [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low energy impacts can cause a complex net of matrix cracking and delaminations inside a composite, which can decrease its strength and durability. The danger of such damage is that in most cases they are invisible on the surface and cannot be detected during visual inspections of the structure, hence they are often called Barely Visible Impact Damage (BVID) [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental verification of this technique was performed on the composite laminated plate with low-velocity impact damage. Dickinson and Fletcher [2] studied the ability of detection and localization of BVID in an aircraft sandwich panel using this technique. The obtained results by the authors indicate a great accuracy in detection and localization of a damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method makes it possible to track the progression of inward cracks. The accuracy depends on the transducer frequency and the minor crack size can be estimated by using Equation 3 [12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, the sensitivity at a given frequency is related to flaw size, but is not directly proportional in the sense that even though a given frequency detects a certain flaw size, this does not imply that this same frequency will detect another larger flaw. This observation leads to the hypothesis that a single frequency technique is not an optimal approach for detecting multiple size flaws within a given structure [2]. An inspection technique with multiple frequencies would appear to be beneficial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%