1984
DOI: 10.1121/1.391115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic diffraction analysis by the impulse response method: A line impulse response approach

Abstract: Acoustic diffraction of plane impulsive waves is considered for free-field, baffled, and pressure release boundary conditions, in the case of an arbitrary spatial distribution of combined, amplitude-time delay modulation in an aperture. The method is based on the impulse response analysis of parallel aperture lines, the line impulse responses being then integrated to give an aperture impulse response. A closed-form, analytical expression is derived for lines having an arbitrary amplitude modulation. In the cas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the results depends strongly on the temporal and spatial resolutions used in the model. By considering the three contour cases: rigid baffle, soft baffle and free field, the impulse response function presented by Piwakowski and Delannoy (1989) and based on the work of Lasota et al (1984) is: Equation (11) is more general than Eq. (8), where the factor that takes into account the different cases of boundary was included, as well as the delay function used in the focalization of arrays.…”
Section: Discrete Representation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the results depends strongly on the temporal and spatial resolutions used in the model. By considering the three contour cases: rigid baffle, soft baffle and free field, the impulse response function presented by Piwakowski and Delannoy (1989) and based on the work of Lasota et al (1984) is: Equation (11) is more general than Eq. (8), where the factor that takes into account the different cases of boundary was included, as well as the delay function used in the focalization of arrays.…”
Section: Discrete Representation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact time-domain impulse response for a rectangular element was described by San Emeterio and Ullate (1992) [16]. For a line source, the exact time-domain impulse response is described by Lasota et al (1984) [14]. Scarano et al (1985) [15] proposed an impulse response calculation for rectangular transducer elements that involved a separable aperture function.…”
Section: Relation To Other Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1͑a͒. The impulse response function can be calculated analytically for several transducer geometries, 7,8,[10][11][12] for several transducer velocity profiles 13,14 and for curved transducers. 9,15 …”
Section: General Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%