2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic emission of fatigue crack in pressure pipe under cyclic pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon leads to a period when only small AE activity occurs. Ai, Liu, Chen, He, and Wang (2010) found that a few burst-type AE signals appear at this stage due to the micro crack formation. During the last stage, crack start to grow and propagate and AE activities reactivate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phenomenon leads to a period when only small AE activity occurs. Ai, Liu, Chen, He, and Wang (2010) found that a few burst-type AE signals appear at this stage due to the micro crack formation. During the last stage, crack start to grow and propagate and AE activities reactivate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In Figure 10(g), the time domain AE signatures from the AECC group show the lowest amplitude with a nearly similar shape to the AE2C group. During crack initiation, burst-type AE appeared with very high amplitude and energy (Ai et al, 2010;Maslov & 1986), while the AE burst from the crack closure phenomenon has lower amplitude (Lee, Rhyim, Kwon, & Ono, 1995;Chang et al, 2007). AE signatures from the AECP and AEOC groups have similar burst behaviour and shape but different amplitudes.…”
Section: Time Domain Ae Signatures Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AE relies on the (usually long-range) detection of stress waves that emanate from damage sites, either intrinsically due to the growth process of the damage or as a result of an external applied load to the 4.4 component. AE is well suited for online monitoring of passive components in nuclear power plants, and has been applied for crack growth detection (Harris and Dunegan 1974;Hutton et al 1984;Hutton 1993;Hutton et al 1993;Ai et al 2010;Meyer et al 2011b), leak detection (IAEA 2008b), and loose part monitoring (IAEA 2008b). GW also relies on the interaction of long-range stress waves with damage in the component (Rose 1999;Meyer et al 2012b).…”
Section: Data Collection -Nde For Passives Variable Sensing For Activesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies on the use of AE for monitoring nuclear components have been performed, and applications include crack growth monitoring, leak detection, and loose part detection and monitoring (Harris and Dunegan 1974;Hutton et al 1984;Hutton 1993;Hutton et al 1993;IAEA 2008b;Ai et al 2010;Meyer et al 2011b). AE was also deployed for a limited field trial to monitor the growth of cracks in two RPV nozzles at Limerick Generating Station Unit 1 (BWR) reactor and the Watts Bar Unit 1 (PWR) reactor (Hutton et al 1991;Hutton et al 1993).…”
Section: Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the number of recorded signals to process becomes very important, classical data-mining methods based on these variables are used to classify them and then the physical source mechanism associated with each class is identified. However, depending on the diversity of source mechanisms (cracks, fractures, delaminations ...) and the type of material (nuclear fuel, zircaloy, inox...) very different types of variables constructed from the AE signals can be discriminant [4,3,2,9]. In the case of nuclear safety experiment which is of interest in this article, the test device is composed of several types of materials and interact with a very complex environment, leading to a difficulty to get enough discriminant variables for a very heterogeneous sample of source mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%