2010
DOI: 10.1190/1.3485768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic impedance as a sequence stratigraphic tool in structurally complex deepwater settings

Abstract: Many deepwater areas of the world are structurally complex and challenging for hydrocarbon exploration; the lack of well control coupled with difficult seismic ties between sub-basins make the gener-ation of a consistent stratigraphic framework challenging. The develop-ment of the framework is critical before any attempt of multibasinal depositional systems analysis can be performed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sarkar et al (2010) suggest that sequential seismic geomorphologic analysis would produce sequential stratigraphic frameworks for more detailed prediction of sand-bodies. Contreras and Latimer (2010) adopted acoustic impedance as a sequential stratigraphic tool when analyzing depositional systems. Stratal slicing has received much attention (e.g., Zeng, 2010Zeng, , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarkar et al (2010) suggest that sequential seismic geomorphologic analysis would produce sequential stratigraphic frameworks for more detailed prediction of sand-bodies. Contreras and Latimer (2010) adopted acoustic impedance as a sequential stratigraphic tool when analyzing depositional systems. Stratal slicing has received much attention (e.g., Zeng, 2010Zeng, , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such is the fundamental gist of this paper with the added emphasis on strengthening interpretation of seismic inversions via attribute analysis (Barnes, 2001;Taner, 2001;Chopra and Marfurt, 2007), and long-standing qualitative and QI techniques described by various workers (Latimer et al, 2000;Chopra and Marfurt, 2008). In detail, this requires pairing selected interpretation aspects of deepwater settings as evidenced from seismic geomorphology and seismic stratigraphy (Weimer et al, 1998;Posamentier and Kolla, 2003;Contreras and Latimer, 2010) with statistical analyses (e.g., Latimer et al, 2000) and rock physics calibration (Avseth et al, 2005) under special consideration of geologic pitfalls and oddities, such as posed by the challenge of discriminating between volcanic sills and sand injectites in amplitude data (Werner, 2003;Jackson et al, 2011). Specifically, the intended scope of this paper has been to discuss selected aspects of qualitative and QI techniques that facilitate 1) quality control and calibration of inversion deliverables, 2) fast-track data reconnaissance, and 3) reservoir characterization, with special emphasis on successful prediction of fluid type(s) in deepwater settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation 10 becomes identical to equation 2 if the layer is horizontal. Such TTI model may represent channel-filled or turbidite sands embedded in shaly deposits, which are often found in continental slope areas (Contreras and Latimer, 2010;van Hoek et al, 2010). As is the case for VTI media, the moveout distortion in image gathers is primarily caused byk x2 , while errors ink x1 do not produce significant residual moveout (Figure 4).…”
Section: Tti Model With Quadratic Velocity Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%