Acoustic indices respond to specific marine mammal vocalizations and sources of anthropogenic noise

Abstract

Using passive acoustic methods for biodiversity conservation and effective ecosystem monitoring is hindered by laborious, human-mediated processes of accurately identifying biologic and anthropogenic sounds within large datasets. Soundscape ecology provides a potential means of addressing this need through the use of automated acoustic-based biodiversity indices, which show promise in representing biodiversity in terrestrial environments. However, the direct relationship between specific underwater sounds and acoustic index measurements are largely unexplored. Using passive acoustic data collected from three broadband hydrophones within the Ocean Observatories Initiative’s cabled arrays in the Pacific northwest, we identified periods of vocalizing marine mammals and sources of anthropogenic noise. Automated calculations of seven acoustic indices were compared were compared across biologic and anthropogenic sound type and call parameters. Although several index measurements did not vary significantly, the Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) measurements increased in response to echolocation clicks from sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) and burst pulses originating from unidentified delphinid species. Measurements of the Bioacoustic Index (BI) decreased dramatically in responses sperm whale echolocation clicks, a more obvious trend when loud clicks were parsed from moderate and quite clicks. Correlations coefficient and confidence interval values between ACI and BI measurements and call characteristics from sperm whales indicate a moderate to strong relationship, which was not found in correlations with delphnid calls. A generalized linear mixed-effect model indicated multiple species and sound types contribute significantly to the variation of several index measurements. Noise generated by passing ships consistently resulted in decreased values for the Normalized Difference Soundscape Index (NDSI) and Total Entropy (H) as compared to quiet periods and periods with vocalizing marine mammals. These findings provide information on the relationship between several acoustic indices and specific underwater sounds produced by marine mammals and anthropogenic sources. This ground-truthing endeavor expands the understanding of acoustic indices and their potential use as a tool for conservation and ecosystem health management purposes.

Unveiling nature’s beat: analyzing the acoustics of an aquatic bug in relation to urban sounds

“…For this reason, we consider that the results we obtained should be understood not only as an analysis of the relationship between anthropophony and animal response, but also as a sample of the effect of the dominance of low spectral frequencies in an acoustic landscape, regardless of its origin. While it is true that most low-frequency sounds in acoustic landscapes correspond to anthropophony (Rountree et al 2020;Ferguson et al 2023), the approach we propose can provide insights into what may occur in systems distant from cities where low spectral frequencies are generated for some reason.…”

Major Soundscape Differences in the West Coast of Scotland Are Reflected in Acoustic Indices

“…Work to establish the response of indices to known marine sound sources is ongoing 21 but questions around the validity of applying indices in marine habitats remains. Without standardised methodologies regarding the application of indices and in the absence of a rigorous understanding of acoustic index behaviour in marine environments, demonstrating the utility of indices which may not have simple correlations to well-established metrics such as SPL's is not straightforward.…”