“…The most recent devices are based on sensors, such as silicone-tube nosebands recording electrical resistance (Rutter et al, 1997), microphones for both intake (Delagarde et al, 1999;Galli et al, 2011;Nadin et al, 2012) and rumination (Reith and Hoy, 2012), mercury switches (Scheibe et al, 1998;Delagarde et al, 1999), and uniaxial, biaxial or tri-axial accelerometers (Scheibe et al, 1998;Nielsen, 2013;Umemura, 2013;Oudshoorn et al, 2013). The relative advantages of these devices depend on the number of variables recorded (including rumination time and bite frequency), their simplicity and robustness in use, specificity and accuracy of grazing-activity detection, method of transferring the data to a computer, degree of automation for data-processing, and financial cost and commercial availability.…”