2018
DOI: 10.1111/mms.12537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic monitoring reveals the times and tides of harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) distribution off central Oregon, U.S.A.

Abstract: Harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) are commonly observed in Oregon's nearshore marine environment yet knowledge of their ecosystem use and behavior remains limited, generating concerns for potential impacts on this species from future coastal development. Passive acoustic monitoring was used to investigate spatial and temporal variations in the presence and foraging activity of harbor porpoises off the Oregon coast from May through October 2014. Digital monitoring devices (DMONs) were deployed to record acou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(179 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The partial dependence plots showed higher values during the night. A similar pattern was described by Holdman et al (2019). The higher harbor porpoise detections at night may reflect a higher prey availability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The partial dependence plots showed higher values during the night. A similar pattern was described by Holdman et al (2019). The higher harbor porpoise detections at night may reflect a higher prey availability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For instance, a strong occurrence of harbor porpoises was predicted during high tide in a Dutch part of the Wadden Sea/North Sea (Ijsseldijk et al, 2015), in the Marsdiep area (Wadden Sea, Netherlands) (Boonstra et al, 2013), and in northwest Scotland (Marubini et al, 2009). By contrast, the presence of harbor porpoises correlated positively with ebb tide in a near‐shore site in southwest Wales, UK, (Pierpoint, 2008) and near‐shore in Oregon (Holdman et al, 2019). In the Ems Estuary, the greater presence of harbor porpoises during high tide could be explained by increased prey availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequent presence of communication sequences and responding conspecifics could furthermore also be an indirect indicator of foraging, possibly representing cooperative foraging strategies [ 83 ]. Due to the described limitations with data logged by static acoustic recorders and additionally having data with incomplete click sequences, the sudden decrease of ICI below 10 ms is to date the best indicator for this method to classify foraging and has been regularly applied [ 26 , 47 , 49 , 52 , 85 , 86 , 87 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the percentage of deviance explained by the model was relatively low (9%), there was sufficient statistical power to identify a significant behavioural response to operation of the turbine. It is not unusual for temporal models of cetacean occurrence to only explain a relatively small amount of the deviance (Holdman et al, 2018) and it is possible that porpoise presence in tidally energetic sites and at the spatial scale monitored is influenced by transient fine‐scale hydrographic features that were not considered in this study (Pierpoint, 2008). In general, it is not possible to use passive acoustic data to distinguish between absence, individuals that are present but not vocalizing, or individuals that are not detectable for some other reason, such as their orientation with respect to the receiving hydrophone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%