Manual of Clinical Phonetics 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9780429320903-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic Phonetics for the Speech Clinician

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained, the prosodic component of the APT answers was assessed perceptually. This is consistent with previous research (e.g., perceptual assessment is considered a gold standard in clinical contexts, Rasinski, 2004;Papakyritsis, 2021, for perceptual assessment of speech prosody in retelling and reading tasks).…”
Section: Analysis 1 Pragmatic Prosodysupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As explained, the prosodic component of the APT answers was assessed perceptually. This is consistent with previous research (e.g., perceptual assessment is considered a gold standard in clinical contexts, Rasinski, 2004;Papakyritsis, 2021, for perceptual assessment of speech prosody in retelling and reading tasks).…”
Section: Analysis 1 Pragmatic Prosodysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Given the fact that specific pitch contours and prosodic patterns encode a set of pragmatic meanings, in the assessment of prosodic felicitousness, we did not carry out an intonational analysis of pitch contours and prosody was assessed holistically by simultaneously considering the effect that different dimensions of prosody (e.g., intonation, amplitude and duration) produce on the listener. This is in line with previous clinical and developmental research (Rasinski, 2004;Papakyritsis, 2021).…”
Section: Prosodic Appropriateness Scoresupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Each answer was evaluated for prosody and, in line with previous research (Papakyritsis, 2021;Rasinski, 2004), this was done on a perceptual basis, that is, based on how appropriate and natural the prosody of the answer sounded to the trained coder. The answer received 2 points for prosody if the answer was pragmatically appropriate and the child used direct speech employing natural sounding prosody consistent with the situation in the presented scenario (e.g., "Can I have a piece of cake?"…”
Section: Expressive Prosodic Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, low inter-judge agreement of perceptual classification is also inherent to the subjectivity of auditory-perceptual ratings that are based on the internal representations of each rater, or because some speech parameters are difficult to assess by ear. Given the difficulty of reliably describing impaired speech features/parameters with solely auditory-perceptual assessments, clinicians and researchers have sought acoustic approaches to describe impaired speech parameters and identify patterns of features leading to reliable classification of subtypes of MSD [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%