2007
DOI: 10.1134/s1063785007110144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic pressure induced period-doubling bifurcations in tympanic membrane oscillations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been observed in EAC SPL measurements for loud tonal stimulation (> 140 dB SPL in humans, 95 dB SPL in guinea pigs) (von Gierke 1950), is perceived by humans for 140 dB SPL tone presentation (Eldredge 1951), and has been reported in intracochlear pressure measurements in gerbils (Huang et al 2012). This distortion is hypothesized to originate from asymmetric stiffness in the tympanic membrane (Pong and Marcaccio 1963), and not an active middle ear process, as subharmonics were observed in pig temporal bones (Usanov et al 2007). No substantial subharmonic distortion is observed in these low frequency responses, thus these results suggest that the generation of subharmonics is a largely high-frequency phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed in EAC SPL measurements for loud tonal stimulation (> 140 dB SPL in humans, 95 dB SPL in guinea pigs) (von Gierke 1950), is perceived by humans for 140 dB SPL tone presentation (Eldredge 1951), and has been reported in intracochlear pressure measurements in gerbils (Huang et al 2012). This distortion is hypothesized to originate from asymmetric stiffness in the tympanic membrane (Pong and Marcaccio 1963), and not an active middle ear process, as subharmonics were observed in pig temporal bones (Usanov et al 2007). No substantial subharmonic distortion is observed in these low frequency responses, thus these results suggest that the generation of subharmonics is a largely high-frequency phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%