3rd Shear Flow Conference 1993
DOI: 10.2514/6.1993-3280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic receptivity of laminar boundary layers over wavy walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not a problem for localized receptivity sites because one need only measure the freestream amplitude at the local position. For distributed receptivity sites, Wiegel & Wlezien (1993) used a second acoustic wave from the diffuser, cancelled the standing wave pattern, and created a streamwise-uniform sound amplitude distribution. This technique is now considered the standard means for obtaining uniform sound fields.…”
Section: Resolution Of Duct Acousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is not a problem for localized receptivity sites because one need only measure the freestream amplitude at the local position. For distributed receptivity sites, Wiegel & Wlezien (1993) used a second acoustic wave from the diffuser, cancelled the standing wave pattern, and created a streamwise-uniform sound amplitude distribution. This technique is now considered the standard means for obtaining uniform sound fields.…”
Section: Resolution Of Duct Acousticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work has recently been taken up by Cullen & Horton (2000), who experimentally verified the qualitative aspects of the theory. Wiegel & Wlezien (1993) considered distributed two-dimensional roughness as receptivity in a effort to provide a data base for the theoretical work of Choudhari (1993) and Crouch (1992b). When multiple receptivity elements are used, it is important to have a uniform sound field across the elements so that the same normalizing |u ac | fs can be used in the receptivity coefficient.…”
Section: Receptivity Of Roughness To Freestream Soundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FRNT-based wavy-wall predictions were undertaken by Wiegel & Wlezien 26 . Wall waviness was reproduced through a series of 40µm-thick polyester tape spaced 25.4mm apart (50.8mm center to center) up to a total of 13 strips.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shown in Fig. 11 is the disturbance amplitude max y {U w,ac (x,y)} (without roughness height and acoustic amplitude parameters ε w and ε ac ), corresponding to the experiment of Wiegel and Wlezien [9] in which a series of tape strips were placed at spacings corresponding to the wavelength of the TS wave excited at the acoustic-driver frequency in a flatplate boundary layer. The receptivity saturation observed in that experiment, and predicted by an extension of the local receptivity theory [10], is apparent.…”
Section: Nonlinear Receptivitymentioning
confidence: 99%