2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2020.02.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic signal analysis for detecting defects inside an arc magnet using a combination of variational mode decomposition and beetle antennae search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To verify the advantages of the proposed WConv-LSTM arc magnets internal defective detection model under complex interference conditions compared with traditional machine learning and common end-to-end fault diagnosis methods, we conducted experiments using WPT, HDM, PCA, VMD, WConv-Attention, GRU, Transformer, and WDCNN. Among them, WPT [1], HDM [2], PCA [3], VMD [4] are all traditional machine learning methods for the internal defect detection of arc magnets proposed by our team. WConv-Attention is a hybrid network model that uses the attention mechanism to replace the LSTM of our model.…”
Section: B Performance Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To verify the advantages of the proposed WConv-LSTM arc magnets internal defective detection model under complex interference conditions compared with traditional machine learning and common end-to-end fault diagnosis methods, we conducted experiments using WPT, HDM, PCA, VMD, WConv-Attention, GRU, Transformer, and WDCNN. Among them, WPT [1], HDM [2], PCA [3], VMD [4] are all traditional machine learning methods for the internal defect detection of arc magnets proposed by our team. WConv-Attention is a hybrid network model that uses the attention mechanism to replace the LSTM of our model.…”
Section: B Performance Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, a growing number of arc magnet manufacturers tend to prefer low-cost detection approaches. Currently, the commonly used detection strategy is to determine whether the internal defects exist through the sensitive human hearing when an arc magnet collides with a mental block, since internal defects are able to change the acoustic and vibration characteristics of an arc magnet being excited [1]- [4]. Such a detection method has low efficiency, poor accuracy, and, more importantly, is easily prone to be errors because of human factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e traditional and existing methods are quite incompetent to enable effective detection. e commonly used detection strategy is to determine whether the internal defects exist through the sensitive human hearing when an arc magnet collides with a mental block, since internal defects are able to change the acoustic and vibration characteristics of an arc magnet being excited [3]. Such a detection method has low efficiency and poor accuracy, and, more importantly, is easily prone to be errors because of human factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, VMD determines the center frequency and bandwidth of each component by iteratively searching and constructing a variational model, which shows good noise immunity and robustness. VMD is widely used in signal processing [25], [26], fault diagnosis [27], [28], wind speed prediction [29], [30] and other fields. But the most prominent shortcoming of VMD is that the decomposition number K value cannot be selected adaptively, and it needs to be preset manually [31], [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%