1989
DOI: 10.1177/002383098903200401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic Versus Contextual Factors in Stop Voicing Perception in Spontaneous French

Abstract: Previous studies on the perception of French stop consonants in isolated utterances have demonstrated that the timing relationship between the onset/offet of voice and the release of the closure provides a very reliable acoustic criterion to separate voiced from voiceless stops, and a major cue for the perception of the voicing feature. The aim of this work is to examine stops pronounced spontaneously during a conversation. Experiment 1, an acoustic analysis of spontaneous productions, largely confirms the hig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was in any case no trace of prevoicing in any of the 24 voiceless coda consonants. The present values are similar to those previously reported for French (Saerens, Serniclaes, & Beeckmans, 1989). They show that the target consonant voicing contrasts were accurately realized by the speaker, with no overlap between the VOT distributions of voiced and voiceless consonants in either onset or coda positions.…”
Section: Stimulisupporting
confidence: 91%
“…There was in any case no trace of prevoicing in any of the 24 voiceless coda consonants. The present values are similar to those previously reported for French (Saerens, Serniclaes, & Beeckmans, 1989). They show that the target consonant voicing contrasts were accurately realized by the speaker, with no overlap between the VOT distributions of voiced and voiceless consonants in either onset or coda positions.…”
Section: Stimulisupporting
confidence: 91%
“…For all other contexts, SCG was always lower for velars than dentals. Within the /l/ context, the difference was numerically, although not statistically larger for /dl/-/gl/ ͑250 Hz͒ Third, VOTs were significantly longer for velars than for dentals, consistent with the literature on VOT variation according to place of articulation ͑Fischer-Jørgensen, 1954; Lisker and Abramson, 1964;Nearey and Rochet, 1994;Peterson and Lehiste, 1960;Saerens et al, 1989;see Cho and Ladefoged, 1999, for an overview͒. For voiceless stops, VOTs were longer for velars than dentals ͑95 vs 55 ms on average͒ in both /l/ and /r/ contexts, F͑1,36͒ = 205.5, p Ͻ 0.00001.…”
Section: Stimulisupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In English, voiced stops mainly fall into the short lag group and voiceless stops into the long lag group. Less data are available in French, but voiced stops correspond to voicing lead and voiceless stops to short lag [33][34][35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%