2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-2402-3_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic Visualization of Interface Deterioration in Adhesive Bond Joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acoustic impedance of aluminum is 17.3x10 6 kg m -2 s -1 while the acoustic impedance of air is 43 kg m -2 s -1 which is six orders less. This drastic difference makes the material-air interface a strong reflector of acoustic waves and should provide a basis for visualization of internal defects and adhesive presence at the interface [14]. The zero adhesion had caused the sound wave to travel indeed in longitudinal waves with compressions and rarefactions.…”
Section: Figure 4: Brightness Scan Of Good Adhesion Of Aluminum Plate...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic impedance of aluminum is 17.3x10 6 kg m -2 s -1 while the acoustic impedance of air is 43 kg m -2 s -1 which is six orders less. This drastic difference makes the material-air interface a strong reflector of acoustic waves and should provide a basis for visualization of internal defects and adhesive presence at the interface [14]. The zero adhesion had caused the sound wave to travel indeed in longitudinal waves with compressions and rarefactions.…”
Section: Figure 4: Brightness Scan Of Good Adhesion Of Aluminum Plate...mentioning
confidence: 99%