1960
DOI: 10.3109/00016486009123145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustical Analysis of the Norwegian S-Sound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, prosody is often considered as the most salient dialect feature when distinguishing between Norwegian dialects (Kerswill, 1994;Maehlum & Røyneland, 2012;van Ommeren and Kveen, 2019). 2 For instance, in an experimental perception study, Fintoft (1970) finds that citizens from five Norwegian locations 3 are able to identify the correct tonal accent (accent 1 as 1 and 2 as 2) in each others' dialects (and their own) to degrees between 83.9% and 97%, and that the tonal accents in the "Oslo dialect" (i.e., UEN) were always correctly identified by all groups. This indicates that Norwegians have a good perceptual knowledge of the tonal accents in UEN.…”
Section: Imitation and Metalinguistic Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, prosody is often considered as the most salient dialect feature when distinguishing between Norwegian dialects (Kerswill, 1994;Maehlum & Røyneland, 2012;van Ommeren and Kveen, 2019). 2 For instance, in an experimental perception study, Fintoft (1970) finds that citizens from five Norwegian locations 3 are able to identify the correct tonal accent (accent 1 as 1 and 2 as 2) in each others' dialects (and their own) to degrees between 83.9% and 97%, and that the tonal accents in the "Oslo dialect" (i.e., UEN) were always correctly identified by all groups. This indicates that Norwegians have a good perceptual knowledge of the tonal accents in UEN.…”
Section: Imitation and Metalinguistic Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the literature reviewed above, we would expect them to have a certain command of the phonetic/acoustic features of the UEN dialect. Given the degree to which Norwegian speakers have (implicit) perceptive knowledge of the UEN variety (Fintoft, 1970), and the fact that they seem to have metalinguistic awareness of some of its relevant features (van Ommeren & Kveen, 2019), it would be remarkable if the RPR prosody, which has been reported to sound like UEN, turned out to be nothing like it upon closer inspection.…”
Section: Aim Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%