2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-015-1621-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustophoretic cell and particle trapping on microfluidic sharp edges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, a bead with a diameter d p flowing in an acoustofluidic device experiences two forces arising from the flow hydrodynamics and the acoustic field . The drag force F D , caused by the microstreaming flow, is directly proportional to the bead diameter, i.e., F D ∝ d p , while the acoustic radiation force F R , due to the scattering of the incident waves from the oscillating cell, is related to the bead diameter as FRdp3 . These relationships imply that the drag force is the dominant force for a smaller bead (e.g., d p = 1 µm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typically, a bead with a diameter d p flowing in an acoustofluidic device experiences two forces arising from the flow hydrodynamics and the acoustic field . The drag force F D , caused by the microstreaming flow, is directly proportional to the bead diameter, i.e., F D ∝ d p , while the acoustic radiation force F R , due to the scattering of the incident waves from the oscillating cell, is related to the bead diameter as FRdp3 . These relationships imply that the drag force is the dominant force for a smaller bead (e.g., d p = 1 µm).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] The drag force F D , caused by the microstreaming flow, is directly proportional to the bead diameter, i.e., F D ∝ d p , while the acoustic radiation force F R , due to the scattering of the incident waves from the oscillating cell, is related to the bead dia meter as ∝ R p 3 F d . [5,26] These relationships imply that the drag force is the dominant force for a smaller bead (e.g., d p = 1 µm). In this regime, the bead acts as a flow tracer, as shown in Figure 2a-c.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustics provide a noninvasive and robust transduction mechanism that has been widely used in micromixing, micropumping, particle or cell separation, and manipulation, protein crystal patterning, microfluidic switches, droplet production, drug delivery, and actuation of micro‐ and nanoswimmers . Acoustic wave–induced microvortices around solid structures and bubbles have been used to perform manipulation of small objects .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustics provide a noninvasive and robust transduction mechanism that has been widely used in micromixing, [6][7][8] micropumping, [9] particle or cell separation, [10,11] and manipulation, [12][13][14][15] protein crystal patterning, [16] microfluidic…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distortions of the channel wall cause the acoustic wave to refract at unexpected angles. 42 Each layer contains at least two sets of alignment marks consisting of an asymmetrical pattern of crosses, 43 enabling different layers to be aligned precisely on top of each other. The masks for the individual microfluidic device layers are ordered from CAD/Art Services, Inc. (Bandon, OR) and imaged with a resolution of 25 400 dpi.…”
Section: Device Designmentioning
confidence: 99%