2019
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbz088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACPred-Fuse: fusing multi-view information improves the prediction of anticancer peptides

Abstract: Fast and accurate identification of the peptides with anticancer activity potential from large-scale proteins is currently a challenging task. In this study, we propose a new machine learning predictor, namely, ACPred-Fuse, that can automatically and accurately predict protein sequences with or without anticancer activity in peptide form. Specifically, we establish a feature representation learning model that can explore class and probabilistic information embedded in anticancer peptides (ACPs) by integrating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For performance evaluation, we used five commonly used metrics including sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), accuracy (ACC), and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC), and AUC (Area Under the Curve), which are widely used in several bioinformatics fields [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] ACPs predicted as non-ACPs. The SE and SP metrics measure the predictive ability of the predictor for the positives and negatives, respectively, while the other two metrics, ACC and MCC, measure the overall predictive performance.…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For performance evaluation, we used five commonly used metrics including sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), accuracy (ACC), and Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC), and AUC (Area Under the Curve), which are widely used in several bioinformatics fields [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] ACPs predicted as non-ACPs. The SE and SP metrics measure the predictive ability of the predictor for the positives and negatives, respectively, while the other two metrics, ACC and MCC, measure the overall predictive performance.…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the recent efforts have mainly focused on the development of computational methods, especially machine learning-based methods in order to expedite the identification of ACPs. Over the last decade, various intelligent statistical-based models have been proposed in the literature to accurately identify ACPs [11][12][13][14]. Hajisharifi et al, generated a non-redundant training dataset, the Hajisharifi-Chen (HC) dataset, which contained 138 ACPs and 206 non-ACPs, whereas the biological sequences were formulated using pseudo amino acid composition (PseAAC) and local-alignment based kernel for the identification of ACPs [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As summarized in a recent review 2 , we could see that TargetACP has been developed by integrating the split amino acid composition and pseudo positionspecific scoring matrix descriptors 14 , which was shown to outperform SVM-based predictors [8][9][10][11][12]19,24 . In the meanwhile, the state-of-the-art ensemble methods comprising PEPred-Suite 20 and ACPred-Fuse 18 provided the highest prediction accuracies as evaluated on the dataset collected by Rao et al 18 . In ACPred-Fuse, it was developed using random forest (RF) model in conjunction with 114 feature descriptors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the past few years, most methods in existence were developed via the use of machine learning (ML) and statistical methods as applied on peptide sequence information for discriminating ACPs from non-ACPs [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] . More details of those existing methods are summarized in two comprehensive review papers 2,3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation