2013
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquired lacrimal sac fistula mimicking basal cell carcinoma

Abstract: These cases illustrate the importance of questioning patients about their previous ocular symptoms when dealing with less familiar periocular lesions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Litwin et al . 31 described three patients with acquired lacrimal sac fistula, originally misdiagnosed as BCC. History of epiphora, discharge, preceding dacryocystitis, and positive syringing test helped confirm the diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Litwin et al . 31 described three patients with acquired lacrimal sac fistula, originally misdiagnosed as BCC. History of epiphora, discharge, preceding dacryocystitis, and positive syringing test helped confirm the diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively long duration of the swelling, negative ROPLAS, the plane of lesion, and free mobility of the swelling raised suspicion of an alternative diagnosis. Litwin et al 31 described three patients with acquired lacrimal sac fistula, originally misdiagnosed as BCC. History of epiphora, discharge, preceding dacryocystitis, and positive syringing test helped confirm the diagnosis.…”
Section: Skin and Subcutaneous Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%