1974
DOI: 10.3758/bf03333036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquired sensory preference for protein in diabetic and normal rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Booth (1974) found that olfaction and taste stimuli are effective but not essential for diet selection, it appears that somatosensory input from the diet and/or the eating activity plays a crucial role in linking dietary choice behavior to metabolic conditions. The presence of less effective sensory cues in the deafferented rat, together with the hypothesis of learning processes as intervening mechanisms, may explain the large variability of the selection parameters between rats and from day to day.…”
Section: Daymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although Booth (1974) found that olfaction and taste stimuli are effective but not essential for diet selection, it appears that somatosensory input from the diet and/or the eating activity plays a crucial role in linking dietary choice behavior to metabolic conditions. The presence of less effective sensory cues in the deafferented rat, together with the hypothesis of learning processes as intervening mechanisms, may explain the large variability of the selection parameters between rats and from day to day.…”
Section: Daymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The sensory cues necessary for these associative learning processes have not yet been clarified. Olfaction and taste appear to facilitate dietary selection but do not seem to be essential (Booth, 1974;Booth & Simson, 1971;Leung, Larson, & Rogers, 1972;Leung, Rogers, & Harper, 1968).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possibility which cannot be ignored is that learning is involved in the behavioural compensation to changes in dietary nutrients. There is evidence that vertebrates are able to associate various features of foods with the consequences, nutritional or otherwise, of their ingestion (Holman, 1969;Booth & Simson, 1971;Rozin & Kalat, 1971;Booth et al, 1972;Simson & Booth, 1973;Booth, 1974b; see also Revusky & Garcia, 1970;Westoby, 1974;Roper, 1983). Learning might underlie the changes in interfeed period found during the 12h, with interfeeds being similar on all four diets at the beginning of the day and then diverging, increasing on high-protein diets and remaining constant or decreasing on lower-…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the selection regime, however, the altered rats were able to maintain themselves free of diabetic symptoms. Rats made diabetic through injections of alloxan or streptozotocin showed decreased carbohydrate intakes and increased protein intakes (Booth, 1974;Vartianen & Bastman-Heiskanen, 19SO).…”
Section: Animals Manipulated Physiologicallymentioning
confidence: 99%