2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-008-0173-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquired stuttering after pallidal deep brain stimulation for dystonia

Abstract: We report two patients, in whom stuttering evolved as an adverse effect of pallidal deep brain stimulation for treating dystonia. Speech dysfluency was observed under conditions that optimally suppressed dystonic symptoms without inducing other extrinsic stimulation effects. This emphasizes a role of the sensorimotor part of the internal globus pallidus in regulating speech fluency.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of stutteringlike behaviour may be due to involvement of the globus pallidus and primary motor cortex, which represent regions of the brain commonly affected in PSP [26]. In fact, stuttering was reported as a consequence of pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with dystonia [27] and was widely present in manganese-induced ephedrone parkinsonism associated with toxic and neurodegenerative damage to globus pallidus [12]. In addition, motor planning responsible for control of fluency has recently been suggested to be coded in the left primary motor cortex whereas this speech motor-related asymmetry was missing in stuttering [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of stutteringlike behaviour may be due to involvement of the globus pallidus and primary motor cortex, which represent regions of the brain commonly affected in PSP [26]. In fact, stuttering was reported as a consequence of pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with dystonia [27] and was widely present in manganese-induced ephedrone parkinsonism associated with toxic and neurodegenerative damage to globus pallidus [12]. In addition, motor planning responsible for control of fluency has recently been suggested to be coded in the left primary motor cortex whereas this speech motor-related asymmetry was missing in stuttering [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the complete pathophysiological mechanism underlying developmental stuttering is still unknown, the key role of disturbed basal ganglia function has been thoroughly discussed (Alm 2004;Giraud et al 2008;Watkins et al 2008). Further support for involvement of the basal ganglia comes from recent studies (Burghaus et al 2006;Nebel et al 2009;Thiriez et al 2013) of surgical outcomes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and dystonia. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus has been reported to worsen as well as to improve developmental stuttering in patients with PD (Burghaus et al 2006;Thiriez et al 2013), while stimulation of the globus pallidus internus has been shown to induce neurogenic stuttering in patients with dystonia (Nebel et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acute effects of stimulation in this location resemble the effects of STN DBS, but long-term stimulation in this location is different, as positive and negative effects are only transient (unpublished observations). Stuttering has been described as an adverse effect of pallidal neurostimulation in dystonia (Nebel et al, 2009) …”
Section: Intrinsic Adverse Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%