2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-016-9444-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquiring Foreign Language Vocabulary Through Meaningful Linguistic Context: Where is the Limit to Vocabulary Learning?

Abstract: The present studies examined the effects of varying degrees of unfamiliar vocabulary within written discourse on individuals' abilities to use linguistic context for the purposes of translation and comprehension (i.e., lexical inferencing). Prose varied in the number of foreign words introduced into each sentence (e.g., 0 through 7 content words per sentence). Furthermore, Krashen's Input Hypothesis and the Evaluation component of the Involvement Load Hypothesis were tested to determine the degree at which non… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with prior research (Krashen, 1989;Krashen & Terrell, 1983;Omaggio, 1986;Shrum & Glisan, 2005). The network of factors includes contextualisation of target vocabulary through the presentation of this vocabulary in meaningful contexts, the use of authentic materials, and the use of students' corrective feedback (Bilke, 2005;de la Garza & Harris, 2017;Fomeche, 2014;Kleinman, 2017;Köylü, 2016;Tang, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is consistent with prior research (Krashen, 1989;Krashen & Terrell, 1983;Omaggio, 1986;Shrum & Glisan, 2005). The network of factors includes contextualisation of target vocabulary through the presentation of this vocabulary in meaningful contexts, the use of authentic materials, and the use of students' corrective feedback (Bilke, 2005;de la Garza & Harris, 2017;Fomeche, 2014;Kleinman, 2017;Köylü, 2016;Tang, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Language learners should be subjected to a reasonable amount of vocabulary that they can master based on their current level of proficiency (the i+1 hypothesis); however, if this amount is too much beyond the learners' levels (i+2), or too little behind their current level (i+0), they are more likely to get demotivated to learn the target vocabulary. Adequate comprehensible input should be made available through providing authentic language material in communicative situations that provide sufficient linguistic, situational or cultural context for vocabulary to be learnable This utilisation of context does not mean that successful acquisition of vocabulary or identification of the mental lexicon will occur solely with contextual prompts (Bikle, 2005;de la Garza & Harris, 2017;Fomeche, 2014). Numerous factors, such as linguistic knowledge or morphological signals can also contribute to how effective a learning strategy is for the students (Bengeleil, 2001;Kleinman, 2017;Köylü, 2016;Nassaji, 2004;Tang, 2017).…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whatever the approach to written texts one may prefer (which may be a combination of both), Küçükoğlu (2013) mentions that students understand written texts better when they are taught how to predict, visualize, make connections, infer, question, and summarize. Lexical inferencing, related to ways of deriving meaning and learning words in context, is also considered a crucial skill for learners to understand the meaning of a text and develop language (de la Garza & Harris, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider this to be a reasonable assumption for adult (L2) learners with pragmatic competence and ample experiences of word use. In fact, an increasing number of L2 wordlearning studies have demonstrated learners' active inferencing about word meaning through linguistic and extra-linguistic context (e.g., de la Garza & Harris, 2017;Nagy, Anderson, & Herman, 1987;Nagy, Herman, & Anderson, 1985;Nassaji, 2006). Previous work has so far focused mainly on acquisition of nouns and other nominals (cf.…”
Section: Using Contextual Understanding To Learn Semantic Meaningmentioning
confidence: 99%