Acquisition and Processing of UAV Fault Data Based on Time Line Modeling Method

Abstract

The number of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) used in various industries has increased exponentially, and abnormal detection of UAVs is one of the primary technical means to ensure that UAVs can work normally. Currently, most anomaly detection models are trained using on-board logs from drones. However, in some cases, using these logs can be problematic due to data encryption, inconsistent descriptions of characteristics, and imbalanced positive and negative samples. Consequently, the on-board logs of UAVs may not be directly usable for training anomaly detection models. Given the above problems, this paper proposes a Time Line Modeling (TLM) method based on the UAV software-in-the-loop (SITL) simulation environment to obtain and process the on-board failure logs of drones. The Time Line Modeling method includes two stages: the Fault Time Point Anchoring Method and Fault Time Window Stretching Method. First, based on the SITL simulation environment, multiple flight missions were constructed. Failures of several common components of UAVs are designed. Secondly, the fault’s initial location and end location are determined by the method of Fault Time Point Anchoring, and the original collection of tagged UAV’s on-board data is realized. Then, in terms of data processing, the features that are not universal are removed, and the flight data of the UAV is optimized by using the data balance method of Time Window Stretching to achieve the balance of normal data and abnormal data. Finally, use of algorithms such as Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO), Random Forest (RF), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) were used to experiment with the processed data. The experimental results showed that the data set obtained based on this method can be effectively applied to the training of machine learning-based anomaly detection models.

A Survey on Sensor- and Communication-Based Issues of Autonomous UAVs

“…In learning-based multi-sensor data fusion methods such techniques as supervised, unsupervised, reinforced, and deep learning help to evaluate the quality of sensor data [49], predict the future values of sensor measurements [50], and in the case of a sensor outage, keep the system operational. However, a downside of the ML and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) based methods is that they demand a substantial amount of quality training data, which could be challenging to obtain [51] and thus, limits their real-world application.…”