Perspectives on Language and Language Development
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-7911-7_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisition, Attrition, and Revitalization of Hebrew in Immigrant Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These components tend to vary from one language community to another. In most situations, the extent of knowledge of the heritage language is likely to be related to a complex interaction of many factors, and the same family-related factors that promote intergenerational language transmission in one group may lead to language shift in other ethnolinguistic groups (Kaufman, 2004;Kloss, 1966;Spolsky, 2004). It is important, therefore, to examine each ethnolinguistic group individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These components tend to vary from one language community to another. In most situations, the extent of knowledge of the heritage language is likely to be related to a complex interaction of many factors, and the same family-related factors that promote intergenerational language transmission in one group may lead to language shift in other ethnolinguistic groups (Kaufman, 2004;Kloss, 1966;Spolsky, 2004). It is important, therefore, to examine each ethnolinguistic group individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, with linguistic input, even if limited, it continues to develop. Second, simultaneously with these processes, enhanced input of L2 as a socially dominant language usually ''defeats'' the child's home language even in families and communities that are strongly motivated to preserve it (Kaufman, 2004;Seville-Troike, 2000). Finally, the acquisition, development and maintenance of L1 across generations are encouraged and stimulated by family efforts to transmit its written form (Baker, 1993;Cummins, 2000;Seville-Troike, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In most cases, the extent of conveying knowledge about language heritage is probably related to a complex of several factors. The same family-related factors, which promote language transmission between generations within one group, can lead to changes in language in other ethno-linguistic groups (Kaufman 2004). …”
Section: School Environment Attitudes and Responsibility In The Learmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For a child born in a host country, the inherent acquisition of language has remained insecure and in an unfinished stage (Kaufman 2004). Nevertheless, with the help of linguistic input, even if limited, the development continues.…”
Section: School Environment Attitudes and Responsibility In The Learmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the broader theoretical context, the U-shaped model might be related to the phenomenon of L1 revitalization among immigrant or second-generation children, which occurs during re-immersion in L1 contexts. These include extended summer visits to the homeland, contact with new waves of temporary residents and immigrants from the country of origin, and immersion in the academic settings of L1-dominant supplementary and day schools (Kaufman, 2004). Up to now, little attention has been given to the complex interaction between the concurrent processes of acquisition, attrition, and revitalization of L1 within the immigrant family context.…”
Section: Mixing Facts and Expectations: Parents' Perception Of The Trmentioning
confidence: 99%