2009
DOI: 10.7202/603200ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisition du lieu d’articulation en langue des signes québécoise chez trois enfants sourds : étude de cas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gestures and signs evolved to use a smaller signing space and became more effortless and economical. This finding is concomitant with previous studies (Lavoie and Villeneuve, 2000;Takkinen, 2003) which have found that signers change from compact signing (e.g., movement of the shoulder) to extended signing (e.g., movement of the elbow). Signers of a new language may become gradually more efficient in the use of articulators reducing the production effort (Dachkovsky et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Gestures and signs evolved to use a smaller signing space and became more effortless and economical. This finding is concomitant with previous studies (Lavoie and Villeneuve, 2000;Takkinen, 2003) which have found that signers change from compact signing (e.g., movement of the shoulder) to extended signing (e.g., movement of the elbow). Signers of a new language may become gradually more efficient in the use of articulators reducing the production effort (Dachkovsky et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A comparable change has been observed in the use of different arm joints – studies on sign language acquisition have found that signers change from first using joints closer to the body (e.g., movement of the shoulder) to using joints further from the body (e.g., movement of the elbow) (Lavoie and Villeneuve, 1999; Takkinen, 2003), causing reduction in the overall size of the sign. This also resembles findings by Mineiro et al (2017), in which signing size decreased in the early stages of a new sign language.…”
Section: Discussion: Bodily Marking Emerges Graduallymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In spite of analysing sign language phonology on the feature level since the late 1980's (Sandler, 1989), and evidence that speaking children acquire features or even clusters of features rather than phonemes (Jakobson, 1968;Smith, 1973; for more recent overviews see Fikkert, 2007;Dresher, 2004), research on the acquisition of sign phonology predominately examines the three parameters handshape, movement, and location (Boyes-Braem, 1990;Cheek et al, 2001;Clibbens & Harris, 1993;Conlin, Mirus, Mauk & Meier, 2000;Karnopp, 2002;Lavoie & Villeneuve, 2000;Marentette & Mayberry, 2000;McIntire, 1977;Meier, 2006;Meier, Mauk, Cheek & Moreland, 2008;Morgan, Barrett-Jones & Stoneham, 2007;Siedlecki & Bonvillian, 1993;Takkinen, 1 For the purpose of this study, we use the term 'feature' to refer to the articulatory dimensions borrowed from Global Signbank, and more broadly, from the Dependency Model, e.g., 'handshape dominant hand', 'location' or 'movement direction'. Manifestations of these features such as circular or straight for 'movement shape' are referred to as feature values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%