78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016 2016
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201601411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisition Geometry-aware Focal Deblending

Abstract: SUMMARYThe applicability of a deblending method is directly related to acquisition parameters, such as source and detector locations. We formulate focal deblending in two alternative ways. In the first case, the double focal transform is used, which relies on a well-sampled source and detector dimension. In the second case, the single-sided focal transform is used, which does not depend on a well-sampled source dimension. Comparing the deblending results, we find that although the double focal transform is sup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it is convenient to combine shot-repetition codes with other blending codes because of the same general source-blending representation. Kontakis et al (2016) domain can improve separating the interfering energy in deblending on the condition of a sufficiently dense source sampling. The deblending framework based on the shaping regularization proposed by Chen et al (2014) offers a flexible way to control deblending using sparsity or coherency constraints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is convenient to combine shot-repetition codes with other blending codes because of the same general source-blending representation. Kontakis et al (2016) domain can improve separating the interfering energy in deblending on the condition of a sufficiently dense source sampling. The deblending framework based on the shaping regularization proposed by Chen et al (2014) offers a flexible way to control deblending using sparsity or coherency constraints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Kontakis et al. (2016), a deblending comparison between the double focal transform (using one‐way propagation operators) and the single‐sided focal transform (using two‐way propagation operators) can be found. The single‐sided focal transform was then used in the smart sub‐set implementation of focal deblending for ocean bottom node (OBN) surveys (Kontakis & Verschuur, 2017a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%