2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1807.11590
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisition of Localization Confidence for Accurate Object Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all the two-stage detection methods, one intersection-over-union (IoU) threshold is required to classify the predicted positive bounding box with the negative bounding box. However, it has been shown that a lower IoU threshold could provide more bounding boxes with a lower precision, which induces a lower recall rate, while a higher IoU threshold could provide fewer bounding boxes with a higher precision, which induces the under detection [28]. To Our study implemented a deep learning-based method for the automatic detection of osteochondral lesions of the talus for the first time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all the two-stage detection methods, one intersection-over-union (IoU) threshold is required to classify the predicted positive bounding box with the negative bounding box. However, it has been shown that a lower IoU threshold could provide more bounding boxes with a lower precision, which induces a lower recall rate, while a higher IoU threshold could provide fewer bounding boxes with a higher precision, which induces the under detection [28]. To Our study implemented a deep learning-based method for the automatic detection of osteochondral lesions of the talus for the first time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With ResNet-101-FPN backbone, ShapeMask outperforms RetinaNet and Mask R-CNN, and is among the best reported approaches using the same backbone. With a larger backbone, ShapeMask achieves comparable performance to SNIP and trails PANet by 2 point without using any techniques from[4,21,44]. This shows that ShapeMask can function as a competitive object detector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Using ResNet-101-NAS-FPN, ShapeMask achieves 45.4 AP which is comparable to SNIP and behind PANet by 2.0 AP. Note that ShapeMask does not apply many existing detection improvement methods [4,21,44]. This shows that ShapeMask can function as a competitive object detector as well.…”
Section: Appendix B: Object Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the pipeline, most of the object detection techniques could be divided into two categories, i.e., onestage method [16,14,17] and two-stage method [5,7,4,18,6,2,11,12,15,1,9,8]. Generally speaking, the one-stage methods focus on the detection speed while the dominant merit of the two-stage methods is the detection precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another track of improving focuses on boosting precision of detectors [11,12,15,1,9,8]. As we know, the series of R-CNN based methods uses the same feature maps to handle both the large and small objects, and consequently cannot adapt the object scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%