1956
DOI: 10.2307/3816176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisitions: May 16 - August 15, 1956

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6B). In contrast, when these data were used to predict combined responses under the assumption of Bliss independence 39 , the expected activation in response to TNFα+TSA was 13% (i.e., 12% in response to TNFα only and 1% in response to TSA only) (Fig. 6C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6B). In contrast, when these data were used to predict combined responses under the assumption of Bliss independence 39 , the expected activation in response to TNFα+TSA was 13% (i.e., 12% in response to TNFα only and 1% in response to TSA only) (Fig. 6C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To use RNAi signatures to determine the relative effective contribution of multiple drugs with additive toxicities within a single NP, we first conducted a Bliss Independence 21 analysis (Figure S9) to confirm that the three drugs used in this investigation display additive toxicity rather than synergistic or antagonistic toxicity. Given an additive drug combination, it should be possible to extract the contribution of each drug to the cell killing mechanism using constrained linear regression methods (if a synergistic drug combination were used, the RNAi signature assay would be dominated by the signature of a single drug in the combination).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%