2015
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20140150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisitions, Productivity, and Profitability: Evidence from the Japanese Cotton Spinning Industry

Abstract: We explore how changes in ownership and managerial control affect the productivity and profitability of producers. Using detailed operational, financial, and ownership data from the Japanese cotton spinning industry at the turn of the last century, we find a more nuanced picture than the straightforward "higher productivity buys lower productivity" story commonly appealed to in the literature. Acquired firms' production facilities were not on average less physically productive than the plants of the acquiring … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 I follow the procedure applied by Braguinsky, Ohyama, Okazaki, and Syverson (2015) and employ a two-step approach in order to investigate the effect of the EU ETS on firm specific productivity changes.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 I follow the procedure applied by Braguinsky, Ohyama, Okazaki, and Syverson (2015) and employ a two-step approach in order to investigate the effect of the EU ETS on firm specific productivity changes.…”
Section: Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criscuolo and Martin (2009) steel industry. Braguinski, Ohyama, Okazaki, and Syverson (2015) investigate the effect of merger on productivity. All these studies feature the inclusion of additional production determinants into the first order Markov process that governs the productivity dynamics.…”
Section: Production Function Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we provide evidence on the effects of M&As on other possible channels of efficiency gains -reallocation of production across plants within the firm and rationalization of headquarter services -before concluding. 7 The exceptions of which we are aware are Jaumandreu (2004), which found some efficiency effects from M&A activity in the Spanish banking industry, Braguinsky et al (2015), which examines the effect of acquisitions on productivity and profitability in the Japanese cotton spinning industry, and Kulick (2015), which finds positive effects on both prices and efficiency resulting from horizontal mergers in the concrete industry using output data measured in physical units of quantity. 8 Bertrand and Zitouna (2008) also examine the impact of M&A activity on profits, but use accounting data on earnings, which can be affected by changes in accounting practices after an M&A transaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Braguinsky, Ohyama, Okazaki, and Syverson (2015) we examine the role played by mergers and acquisitions in improving plant-level productivity and profitability during the industry consolidation phase in the first two decades of the 20 th century. In Braguinsky and Hounshell (2015b) coevolution of the industry and the firms comprising it is examined from strategic management point of view through several stages of industry evolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capital to labor ratios are by this time remarkably similar across all categories of firms and while the female to male operatives ratio is statistically higher in firms with sources of knowledge from college-educated engineers as compared to all other firms (and lower in Ishikawa-advised firms), the difference is much less in magnitude than it was in 1893 (Table 5 above) and economically is no longer significant. There is no economic or statistical difference across different firm categories in terms of total factor productivity in 1898 either, which is also a reflection of uniform technological practices as well as capital vintage differences (whereby newer entrants were able to take advantage of opportunities provided by imported raw cotton and order faster and more versatile machines for their mills--see Braguinsky, Ohyama, Okazaki, and Syverson, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%