2012
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.111.094425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACRIN 6665/RTOG 0132 Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Imatinib Mesylate for Operable Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Monitoring with 18F-FDG PET and Correlation with Genotype and GLUT4 Expression

Abstract: We investigated the correlation between metabolic response by 18F-FDG PET and objective response, glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4) expression, and KIT/PDGFRA mutation status in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor undergoing neoadjuvant imatinib mesylate therapy. Methods 18F-FDG PET was performed at baseline, 1–7 d, and 4 or 8 wk after imatinib mesylate initiation. Best objective response was defined by version 1.0 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Mutational analysis and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
30
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, day 8 PET correctly predicted all CT responses to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors but preceded them by 7 weeks and response on day 8 was associated with longer PFS. 38 In our study, SUV max at day 8 as a continuous measure was associated with both response and PFS with a significant difference in PFS for patients with day 8 SUV max ,13.78 vs $13.78. Unfortunately, more clinically useful parameters such as SUV max at baseline or ΔSUV max did not correlate with response, perhaps because of the small sample size.…”
Section: Bartlett Et Almentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For example, day 8 PET correctly predicted all CT responses to imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors but preceded them by 7 weeks and response on day 8 was associated with longer PFS. 38 In our study, SUV max at day 8 as a continuous measure was associated with both response and PFS with a significant difference in PFS for patients with day 8 SUV max ,13.78 vs $13.78. Unfortunately, more clinically useful parameters such as SUV max at baseline or ΔSUV max did not correlate with response, perhaps because of the small sample size.…”
Section: Bartlett Et Almentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In rare cases where a locally advanced GIST is suspected on imaging but obtaining a histopathological diagnosis including mutational analysis is not feasible or associated with considerable risk, a possible alternative may be to start imatinib treatment using early assessment of treatment response by FDG-PET imaging. Metabolic response seen on FDG-PET as early as 1-2 weeks after initiation of treatment has been demonstrated to accurately predict CT morphological response occurring at 8-week follow-up [63,64,65]. Thus, patients with lesions that do not demonstrate major reduction in FDG uptake after 1-2 weeks of imatinib treatment should not continue to receive the drug and undergo definite histopathological assessment or upfront surgery.…”
Section: Management Of Localized Gistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the response to many TKIs is monitored indirectly, for example, by measuring changes in 18 F-FDG uptake in gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated by imatinib (15). This method provides information mainly about metabolism in the lesion and its changes in response to therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%