2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05674-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: an additional acromioclavicular cerclage does not improve horizontal stability in double coraco-clavicular tunnel technique

Abstract: PurposeHorizontal instability—especially in the posterior plane—is a common problem after acromioclavicular joint injuries. The purpose was to compare the stability of a single coraco‐clavicular tunnel technique and a double coraco‐clavicular tunnel technique for coraco‐clavicular ligament reconstruction and to examine the influence of an additional acromioclavicular cerclage on the horizontal stability in the acromioclavicular joint. Methods21 acromioclavicular joints of human cadaveric shoulders were randoml… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…19 However, a recent systematic review including 1704 patients demonstrated a troubling complication rate of 14.2% in addition to a failure rate of 20.8% after open or arthroscopic AC joint stabilization. 12 Since Scheibel et al 33 postulated that clinical outcomes were less favorable if horizontal instability was present after AC joint stabilization, biomechanical 8,9,14,20,22,30,37 and clinical research 2,13,15,16,23,36,38 have focused on the causes of and strategies to mitigate horizontal instability. Horizontal instability can occur in the anterior and posterior directions; however, the posterior direction is thought to be more relevant in the clinical setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 However, a recent systematic review including 1704 patients demonstrated a troubling complication rate of 14.2% in addition to a failure rate of 20.8% after open or arthroscopic AC joint stabilization. 12 Since Scheibel et al 33 postulated that clinical outcomes were less favorable if horizontal instability was present after AC joint stabilization, biomechanical 8,9,14,20,22,30,37 and clinical research 2,13,15,16,23,36,38 have focused on the causes of and strategies to mitigate horizontal instability. Horizontal instability can occur in the anterior and posterior directions; however, the posterior direction is thought to be more relevant in the clinical setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median CCD was 18 (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) mm at the time of diagnosis, and it was 7.5 (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) mm after the operation 1 year later, representing a significant difference (t = −20.7 P< 0.001). The average VAS score preoperatively was 4.9 (3-7), and it improved to 0.55 (0-2), including the patient with subluxation, the difference was statistically significant (Wilcoxon test, median = −6, P < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Surgical procedures focused on anatomic reconstruction of the coraco-clavicular ligaments. Biomechanical studies showed that double coraco-clavicular tunnel technique results in a significant higher stability than single coraco-clavicular tunnel technique [14]. We used optimal clavicular tunnel placements to install a double-bundle titanium cable reconstruct CC ligament (the trapezoid and conoid ligaments) in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through computer simulation of nite element analysis combined with biomechanical research, many scholars consider that additional augmentation suture repair of acromioclavicular ligament after reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament can signi cantly improve the postoperative posterior displacement and rotation stability of acromioclavicular joint (11)(12)(13). However, some researchers carried out biomechanical analysis of cadaveric specimens simulating surgically treated acromioclavicular joint dislocation, and found that the effect of an additional acromioclavicular cerclage on the stability of acromioclavicular joint seemed to be negligible (14). Therefore, they do not recommend to use additional acromioclavicular cerclage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%