Across-discipline journal awareness and evaluation: Implications for the promotion and tenure process

Henderson, Glenn V.; Ganesh, Gopala; Chandy, P. R.

doi:10.1016/0148-6195(90)90041-a

Cited by 28 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Topics addressed include journal awareness and evaluation in relation to the academic promotion and tenure process (Henderson et al, 1990); academic familiarity, perceptions and rankings of journals (Brown and Heufner, 1994;Coe and Weinstock, 1984;Judge, 1984); research performance assessment (Kaplan, 1991;Murphy, 1994;Pollitt, 1987); individual academic and department research performance and associated variables (Colman et al, 1992;Heck et al, 1990;Lyall, 1978;Nobes, 1987;Zivney et al, 1995); and the citation processes (Cronin, 1984;Garfield, 1979a, b;Holsapple et al, 1994;MacRoberts and MacRoberts, 1989;McRae, 1974;Print and Hattie, 1995).…”

Section: Assessing Journal Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Rites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship

Gray¹,

Guthrie²,

Parker³

2002

Accounting Forum

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The changes in public sectors of many western democracies, particularly as applied in public funded universities, have led to an environment where students have been redefined as customers, organisations and their programs have been redefined as fee generating and services have been reconstituted as commercialised competitive activities in the open marketplace. Work in this 'new' Higher Education Sector (HES) environment has been construed as fee generating and cost incurring, subject to financial control and evaluated for its tangible, measured outputs. This paper considers the contemporary attitudes in accounting and management academia to what constitutes research and scholarship, using Australia and the UK as case examples. From this perspective, it is argued that the changing HES environment is transforming and commodifying research into a homogenised, measured and traded commodity. This commodity is then traded in the new academic marketplace in forms such as departmental research rankings, appointability of candidates for professorial positions, departmental and individual academic competitiveness for research grants, and university eligibility for government research funding. In addition, we contend that this commodification is exhibiting a convergent tendency, in that the tradable currency shows signs of reductionism to a common form of measurement, that is, to refereed research journal articles. This paper seeks to further open up discussion and debate on these issues from both acad-

show abstract

Section: Assessing Journal Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Rites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship

Gray¹,

Guthrie²,

Parker³

2002

Accounting Forum

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5 Because management is an interdisciplinary field, a plethora of publication outlets is available. Faculty in disciplines other than management are sometimes bewildered by the array of journals and may believe that publication is more easily accomplished in management than in, for example, accounting.…”

Section: The Goal Of Encouraging Publicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ranking the Management Journals

Harris¹

2008

Journal of Scholarly Publishing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of this project was to create a ranking of journals in management and related areas. This compilation is designed for use as an aid in appraising the performance of faculty members and as a guide to potential authors seeking outlets for their work. The information in this analysis does not alter the well-accepted top-tier list of journals; instead, it provides differentiation among the remaining vast majority of journals. The rationale for developing such a list and the ways in which this list compares with those previously accessible are discussed. The methodology used to rank journals is presented, along with a description of the results. A listing of journals ranked in the top five categories is provided in the Appendix.

show abstract

“…21,22,28,29 Members can become specialists in the evaluation of scholarship 30 and learn to value all forms of scholarship 31 equivalently. 21,22,28,29 Members can become specialists in the evaluation of scholarship 30 and learn to value all forms of scholarship 31 equivalently.…”

Section: A Firewall For Academic Evaluation Of Facultymentioning

confidence: 99%

When Should Students Learn Essential Physical Examination Skills? Views of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors in North America

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Variability existed among CDIM members regarding their expectations for the timing of student physical examination learning in the undergraduate medical curriculum. Creating a common vision among clerkship directors and faculty regarding what neophyte clinicians must learn to do and when they are expected to be able to do it will help to address the issue of physical examination proficiency standards of medical students.

show abstract

Across-discipline journal awareness and evaluation: Implications for the promotion and tenure process

Cited by 28 publications

References 58 publications

Rites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship

Rites of passage and the self-immolation of academic accounting labour: an essay exploring exclusivity versus mutuality in accounting scholarship

Ranking the Management Journals

When Should Students Learn Essential Physical Examination Skills? Views of Internal Medicine Clerkship Directors in North America

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About