2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap

Abstract: Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) measures of peak amplitude, and amplitude-growth function (AGF) slope have been shown to reflect characteristics of cochlear health (primarily spiral ganglion density) in anesthetized cochlear-implanted guinea pigs. Likewise, the effect of increasing the interphase gap (IPG) in each of these measures also reflects SGN density in the implanted guinea pig. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that suprathreshold ECAP measures, and also how they change as th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
76
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
76
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, animal models are used to identify eCAP measures that are sensitive to neural survivals (e.g., Miller et al, 1994 ; Prado-Guitierrez et al, 2006 ; Ramekers et al, 2014 ). These measures have been subsequently used in human CI users to evaluate their correlations with behavioral measures of auditory perception and/or speech perception (e.g., Brown et al, 1990 ; Gantz et al, 1994 ; Kim et al, 2010 ; Pfingst et al, 2015a ; Schvartz-Leyzac and Pfingst, 2016 ). This section reviews studies related to one eCAP measure that has been studied for many years (i.e., slope of the eCAP I/O function) and the three most recently developed eCAP measures (sensitivity to inter-phase-gap, phase duration and pulse polarity).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, animal models are used to identify eCAP measures that are sensitive to neural survivals (e.g., Miller et al, 1994 ; Prado-Guitierrez et al, 2006 ; Ramekers et al, 2014 ). These measures have been subsequently used in human CI users to evaluate their correlations with behavioral measures of auditory perception and/or speech perception (e.g., Brown et al, 1990 ; Gantz et al, 1994 ; Kim et al, 2010 ; Pfingst et al, 2015a ; Schvartz-Leyzac and Pfingst, 2016 ). This section reviews studies related to one eCAP measure that has been studied for many years (i.e., slope of the eCAP I/O function) and the three most recently developed eCAP measures (sensitivity to inter-phase-gap, phase duration and pulse polarity).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the spiral ganglion density only accounted for 50% of the variance in the slope of eCAP I/O function (Pfingst et al, 2014 ). In human CI users, flatter slopes have been found to be associated with longer duration of hearing loss (e.g., Schvartz-Leyzac and Pfingst, 2016 ). Studies evaluating the association between the slope of eCAP I/O function and speech perception scores in human CI users show inconsistent results.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Abweichend von den Standardeinstellungen der Software wurde die Pulsbreite von 25 µs auf bis zu 100 µs erhöht sowie die Pause zwischen den beiden biphasischen Pulsen (IPG, Interphasegap) von 7 µs auf 25 µs erhöht. Grund hierfür waren eigene praktische Erfahrungen und tierexperimentelle Befunde [22,23]…”
Section: Bestimmung Der Nrt-schwellen Bei Verschiedenen Pulsbreitenunclassified
“…Although a broad (monopolar) stimulation mode and the use of relatively high current levels results in a broad spread of current and potential recruitment of neurons from across the cochlea, the neurons closest to the recording electrodes likely influence the amplitude more than neurons farther away (discussed in Miller et al., 2008 ). Amplitude of the recorded eCAP varies as the stimulation and recording sites are varied across intracochlear electrodes in CI users, even when the stimulation mode is broad ( DeVries et al., 2016 , Schvartz-Leyzac and Pfingst, 2016 ). Moreover, the amplitude profile varies in a manner that is unique to the individual.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%