2012
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2011.650625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Across-task variability in agrammatic performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with a processing approach to agrammatism, in which it is argued that agrammatic performance goes up when the processing load is reduced (e.g. Sahraoui & Nespoulous, 2012). Grammatical gender in Danish is generally not semantically meaningful, and producing it erroneously does not have communicative consequences.…”
Section: Individual Adaptive Strategiessupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in line with a processing approach to agrammatism, in which it is argued that agrammatic performance goes up when the processing load is reduced (e.g. Sahraoui & Nespoulous, 2012). Grammatical gender in Danish is generally not semantically meaningful, and producing it erroneously does not have communicative consequences.…”
Section: Individual Adaptive Strategiessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The same participants were able to produce definite articles in a picture description taska task which is more constrained than spontaneous speech, and in which agrammatic speakers have previously been found to perform better (Sahraoui & Nespoulous, 2012;Salis & Edwards, 2004).…”
Section: Agrammatism As a Problem With Grammatical Itemsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…morpho-syntactic simplifications) may be due to universal strategies that emerge from the need to compensate for a difficulty in retrieving specific linguistic information (i.e. accessing morphemes) at the formulation level or from a deeper impairment at the conceptualization level (see also Klein & Perdue, 1997;Kolk 2006;Sahraoui & Nespoulous 2012), but it is difficult to tease these two levels of processing apart. Differences in compensation (e.g., Path lexicalization in French vs. grammaticalization in English) rather reflect the strong impact of language on encoding processes irrespective of competence or syndromes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the early 20 th century (Lashley, 1929;Goldstein, 1939;Luria, 1970Luria, [1947), many researchers and clinicians have been interested in the concept of compensatory or adaptive strategies, which are assumed to allow aphasic subjects to overcome communicative difficulties (Penn, 1987;Bertoni, Stoffel, & Weniger, 1991;Kolk & Heeschen, 1990, 1996Simmons-Mackie & Damico, 1997;Oelschlaeger & Damico, 1998;Heeschen & Schegloff, 1999, 2003Laakso & Klippi, 1999;Wilkinson, Beeke, & Maxim, 2003;Nespoulous & Virbel, 2004;Simmons-Mackie, Kearns, & Potechin, 2005;Wilkinson, Gower, Beeke, & Maxim, 2007;Salis & Edwards, 2004;Beeke, Wilkinson, & Maxim, 2009;Sahraoui & Nespoulous, 2012;Nespoulous, Baqué, Rosas, Marczyk, & Estrada, 2013;Rhys, Ulbrich, & Ordin, 2013). Within compensation and/or adaptation frameworks there are two main assumptions: 1) compensatory adaptation is pervasive in both ordered and disordered communication (Nespoulous & Virbel, 2004;Perkins, 2007) and occurs when various underlying semiotic, cognitive and sensorimotor capacities both within and between individuals become inefficient for interpersonal communication; and 2) disordered speech output (in our case, aphasic speech output) is not the direct reflection of the underlying linguistic impairments but rather the result of strategic choices developed in order to face these disorders and to improve communicative effectiveness.…”
Section: Compensatory Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%