“…Since the early 20 th century (Lashley, 1929;Goldstein, 1939;Luria, 1970Luria, [1947), many researchers and clinicians have been interested in the concept of compensatory or adaptive strategies, which are assumed to allow aphasic subjects to overcome communicative difficulties (Penn, 1987;Bertoni, Stoffel, & Weniger, 1991;Kolk & Heeschen, 1990, 1996Simmons-Mackie & Damico, 1997;Oelschlaeger & Damico, 1998;Heeschen & Schegloff, 1999, 2003Laakso & Klippi, 1999;Wilkinson, Beeke, & Maxim, 2003;Nespoulous & Virbel, 2004;Simmons-Mackie, Kearns, & Potechin, 2005;Wilkinson, Gower, Beeke, & Maxim, 2007;Salis & Edwards, 2004;Beeke, Wilkinson, & Maxim, 2009;Sahraoui & Nespoulous, 2012;Nespoulous, Baqué, Rosas, Marczyk, & Estrada, 2013;Rhys, Ulbrich, & Ordin, 2013). Within compensation and/or adaptation frameworks there are two main assumptions: 1) compensatory adaptation is pervasive in both ordered and disordered communication (Nespoulous & Virbel, 2004;Perkins, 2007) and occurs when various underlying semiotic, cognitive and sensorimotor capacities both within and between individuals become inefficient for interpersonal communication; and 2) disordered speech output (in our case, aphasic speech output) is not the direct reflection of the underlying linguistic impairments but rather the result of strategic choices developed in order to face these disorders and to improve communicative effectiveness.…”