2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccw.2014.6881306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACT-MAC: An asynchronous cooperative transmission MAC protocol for WSNs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, failing to provide an integrated MAC solution, none of above mentioned works (both non-cooperative DC and cooperative non-DC) on MAC layer fully addresses the lifetime of WSNs. CDC-MAC [42] and ACT-MAC [43] consider CT in a duty cycle context, however they address only the two-hop network and lack scalability to the multi-hop network. Our work SCT-MAC [44] and OSC-MAC [45] integrate DC and CT in multi-hop networks, and will be highlighted in Section 5.…”
Section: Deliberate Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, failing to provide an integrated MAC solution, none of above mentioned works (both non-cooperative DC and cooperative non-DC) on MAC layer fully addresses the lifetime of WSNs. CDC-MAC [42] and ACT-MAC [43] consider CT in a duty cycle context, however they address only the two-hop network and lack scalability to the multi-hop network. Our work SCT-MAC [44] and OSC-MAC [45] integrate DC and CT in multi-hop networks, and will be highlighted in Section 5.…”
Section: Deliberate Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining range extension and duty cycle scheduling becomes very challenging for multihop networks, because the cooperative nodes have to agree on a wakeup rendezvous time to perform CT even if their schedules might be asynchronous. The CDC-MAC and ACT-MAC protocols [42,43] are designed to consider CT in a duty cycle context, however they apply to only the two-hop network and lack scalability to the multi-hop network. The scheduling algorithms SCT-MAC and OSC-MAC proposed in [44,45] for multi-hop networks both have pipelining and orthogonality features, wherein interfering nodes' schedules are non-overlapping with each other, and schedules of nodes along a primary route towards the Sink are cyclically increased, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Duty Cycling Mac For Range Extension Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that, in a more practical setting with control packets accounted for, we expect to see a bigger degradation value. However, fortunately it is shown that, even with control packets accounted for, CT still has a significant advantage over non-CT in both small networks [9] and large-scale multihop networks [13].…”
Section: Energy Harvesting Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A receiver, gaining a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) advantage of 10 dB to 20 dB through PHY combining [6], can decode the message at an extended range [7]. CT range extension has been experimentally demonstrated in [8], and it shows significant impact on Layer Two and Layer Three of a WSN by eliminating the "energy hole" in EC network [9,10] and by providing better Quality of Service in EH networks [11]. Time-division CT (TDCT) is one type of cooperation, in which the source node multicasts the packet, and the cooperators that decode the packet forward it in orthogonal time slot [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation