1999
DOI: 10.1128/aac.43.6.1373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACTG 260: a Randomized, Phase I-II, Dose-Ranging Trial of the Anti-Human Immunodeficiency Virus Activity of Delavirdine Monotherapy

Abstract: ACTG 260 was an open-label, four-arm trial designed to study the safety and anti-human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV) activity of delavirdine monotherapy at three ranges of concentrations in plasma compared to those of control therapy with zidovudine or didanosine. Delavirdine doses were adjusted weekly until subjects were within their target trough concentration range (3 to 10, 11 to 30, or 31 to 50 M). A total of 113 subjects were analyzed. At week 2, the mean HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level declines among t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical significance of the pharmacokinetic differences seen between the subjects with and without gastric hypoacidity is difficult to assess because of the differences between the current clinical use of delavirdine and its use in studies evaluating pharmacokinetic‐clinical response relationships. Similar to another study of delavirdine monotherapy, 34 maculopapular rash in this study occurred more frequently in subjects with normal gastric acidity and higher delavirdine pharmacokinetic exposure, suggesting that rash may be related to delavirdine exposure. However, the delavirdine exposure in the subjects without gastric hypoacidity who had rashes was comparable to the other subjects in that particular group of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The clinical significance of the pharmacokinetic differences seen between the subjects with and without gastric hypoacidity is difficult to assess because of the differences between the current clinical use of delavirdine and its use in studies evaluating pharmacokinetic‐clinical response relationships. Similar to another study of delavirdine monotherapy, 34 maculopapular rash in this study occurred more frequently in subjects with normal gastric acidity and higher delavirdine pharmacokinetic exposure, suggesting that rash may be related to delavirdine exposure. However, the delavirdine exposure in the subjects without gastric hypoacidity who had rashes was comparable to the other subjects in that particular group of subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Nowadays, it is mainly administered in combination with PIs or in rescue therapies, substituting a nucleoside analogue [58]. The most common side effect (seen in 30% of patients) is a pruriginous maculopapular exanthem and is usually non-severe.…”
Section: Delavirdinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common reported adverse effects of delavirdine are rash (18% of cases), nausea (7%), diarrhea (4%), headache (6%), fatigue (4%), and increases in transaminase levels (5%) [94,95]. Delavirdine is considered to be well tolerated.…”
Section: Non-nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (Nnrtis)mentioning
confidence: 99%