2018
DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2018-011496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acting by persuasion— values and rhetoric in medical certificates of work incapacity: A qualitative document analysis

Abstract: When the patient applies for disability benefit in Norway, the general practitioner (GP) is required by the National Insurance Administration (NAV) to confirm that the patient is unfit for work due to disease. Considering the important social role of medical certificates, they have been given surprisingly little attention by the medical critique. They may make essential differences to peoples' lives, legitimise large social costs and, in addition, the GPs report that issuing certificates can be problematic. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Håvold et al (2018) also note that compared to frontline welfare workers, the medical profession ranks high in the occupational hierarchy, with more education and a strong professional organisation. This is reflected in the strong position ‘objective’ medical assessment has in the social insurance system, although GPs may often find it hard to live up to these expectations (Aarseth et al, 2019; Krohne & Brage, 2008). We find few stories, however, about NAV frontline workers actively educating GPs on activation and an ‘asset‐based’ ideology of health, as found by Håvold et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Håvold et al (2018) also note that compared to frontline welfare workers, the medical profession ranks high in the occupational hierarchy, with more education and a strong professional organisation. This is reflected in the strong position ‘objective’ medical assessment has in the social insurance system, although GPs may often find it hard to live up to these expectations (Aarseth et al, 2019; Krohne & Brage, 2008). We find few stories, however, about NAV frontline workers actively educating GPs on activation and an ‘asset‐based’ ideology of health, as found by Håvold et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GPs on the other hand, particularly when faced with mentally ill patients, or patients with musculoskeletal complaints, who have little or no work experience, feel ill equipped in making qualified professional judgements about individuals' work ability (Krohne & Brage, 2008). The inherent conflict between the medical ethos of being the patient's advocate and making professional judgements under great uncertainty, seem to result in various rhetoric strategies in medical certificates, ranging from emphasising the patient's 'worthiness' or positive character, like their willingness to work; making pleas for sympathy and understanding; to displaying professional uncertainties and doubts (Aarseth et al, 2019). Håvold et al (2018) also note that compared to frontline welfare workers, the medical profession ranks high in the occupational hierarchy, with more education and a strong professional organisation.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23. Guri Aarseth et al (2019), “Acting by Persuasion— Values and Rhetoric in Medical Certificates of Work Incapacity: A Qualitative Document Analysis,” Medical Humanities 45: 60–6; Hande Güzel (2018), “Pain as Performance: Re-Virginisation in Turkey,” Medical Humanities 44, no. 2: 89–95.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is perhaps amplified in psychiatry, where we aspire to parity of esteem and yet many of us have at times just scribbled ‘stress’ upon a sick note to minimise stigma or awkward questions. Aarseth et al 5 label such certificates ‘social actors’ as they produce change (including releasing critical public resources and funds), and report on an analysis of sick notes written by general practitioners in Norway, exploring values, attitudes and language. Interestingly, in the evaluated sample, arguments based on factual medical information and effects on functioning were not to the fore.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%